Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. <br /> PC : 9-4-86 <br /> SU-86-10 <br /> Page 3 <br /> to Woodson Road were all part of the process in satisfying <br /> conditions of approval applied to S-81-30. Expenditures of <br /> this type are typical of subdivision projects and not unusual . <br /> 3 . The appellant notes that any errors or any inadequacy in the <br /> previous EIR is the responsibility of the Planning Division. <br /> EIR-79-1 was adequate at the time it was prepared. The <br /> issues that have arisen were not apparent at the time, and <br /> only as a result of this recent application did these <br /> problems become apparent . Staff ' s position is that these <br /> issues that have been recently identified need to be further <br /> investigated. The public should not be in a position to sub- <br /> sidize or use public monies to accommodate a developer who <br /> may ultimately benefit from this project . <br /> y, , <br />