SU0014573 (3) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

To Planning Commission Item No. 1 From: Chet Davisson Sub : SU-86-10 Date : 3-19-87 Page: - 2 - However, the applicants' attorney, Steve Herum, recently advised staff that no redesign will be forthcoming and that the appli- cants wish to have their appeal on the EIR requirement heard at this time . However, since a year has elapsed since the application was determined complete and no significant progress has been made, staff recommends that action be taken tonight as detailed above . In addition to denying the appeal of the EIR requirement , a denial "without prejudice" action for SU-86-10 is also recom- mended. This action will close the current project file but allow the applicant to refile at such time as he is ready to proceed diligently to completion. Processing of the new applica- tion could pick up essentially at the point that this file ends, saving duplication of completed work and analysis . Also pertinent to this appeal is the status of the Lodi (Lind' s ) Airport . The Commission recently delayed inclusion of this air- port in the Planning Title ' s AP combining zone. The Commission asked for more information on the operation of this airport before taking action to include it in the AP chapter . This data has been provided as an "informational" report for consideration at tonight ' s hearing. This information indicates that the crosswind runway is necessary for the airport ' s continued opera- tion (refer to the report for specific information) . Staff ' s position regarding the potential air safety concerns remains regardless of whether or not this airport has an adopted AP com- bining zone . This designation serves as an extra flag to bring attention to possible safety restrictions adopted in the Council of Government ' s (COG) Airport Land Use Plan. The Lodi (Lind' s) Airport and environs continue to be subject to the provisions of this plan whether or not the airport combining zone is adopted. Further, COG has informed the Planning Division that residential construction on all lots within the "Inner Approach/ Climb-out" zone is prohibited, and further, COG has recommended denial of the subdivision because of the need for air/space protection and of the subdivision' s proximity to the airport in general . r CD/DD/blm