Laserfiche WebLink
not have time to leave a full inspection report, so a checklist was left with Mr. <br />Khajevandi. A completed inspection report was faxed to the facility on July 30, 2010 <br />(Attachment 35), and photos taken during the inspection were sent by mail on August 4, <br />2010 (Attachment 36). <br />On July 29, 2010, a permit application, SR0060637, was submitted for the 91 -octane fill <br />sump sensor that was replaced during the previous day's inspection, and repair of the <br />wiring for the 87 -octane south UST annular sensor. Mr. Cacapit approved the permit on <br />August 4, 2010 (Attachment 37). <br />On August 30, 2010, a return to compliance certification and disposal records for the <br />waste found on site during the July 26, 2010, hazardous waste inspection were <br />submitted (Attachment 38). A corrective actions statement was not submitted. <br />On September 1, 2010, Mr. Cacapit sent a fax to Mr. Khajevandi asking for a corrective <br />actions statement for the violations on the July 26, 2010, hazardous waste inspection <br />report (Attachment 39). <br />On September 7, 2010, Mr. Cacapit sent a fax to Mr. Khajevandi asking for a corrective <br />actions statement for the violations on the July 26, 2010, hazardous waste inspection <br />report (Attachment 40). <br />On September 14, 2010, a return to compliance certification, corrective actions <br />statement, a September 8, 2010, work order for repairs to the leaking dispensers, and <br />an updated designated operator employee training record were submitted (Attachment <br />41). <br />On September 23, 2010, an amendment to permit application SR0060637 was <br />submitted to replace the shear valve at dispenser 5/6. Mr. Cacapit approved the <br />amendment the following day (Attachment 42). <br />On October 13, 2010, Mr. Cacapit witnessed the successful testing of the 87 -octane <br />annular sensor (Attachment 43). The 91 -octane annular sensor was replaced and <br />tested successfully while on site, and the permit application would have to be amended <br />to include this. Mr. Khajevandi submitted a recordable release statement to Mr. Cacapit <br />for the diesel leaks for during the July 28, 2010, UST inspection (Attachment 44). <br />On December 7, 2010, an amendment to permit application SR0060637 was submitted <br />for the 91 -octane UST annular sensor replaced on October 13, 2010 (Attachment 45). <br />Mr. Cacapit approved the amendment that day. <br />On April 22, 2011, a monitoring system certification test report for the testing performed <br />on July 28, 2010, was submitted, eight months late (Attachment 46). <br />On July 26, 2011, Ms. Michelle Henry, Senior REHS, EHD, performed a routine UST <br />inspection (Attachment 47) and witnessed the monitoring system certification, leak <br />detector testing, and spill container testing. The diesel leak detector failed when tested, <br />and liquid was found in the vent sump. <br />On August 3, 2011, a permit application, SR0063168, was submitted to replace the <br />diesel leak detector. Mr. Cacapit approved the permit the following day (Attachment 48). <br />IJ <br />