Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Angie Manetti <br />August 2, 2018 <br />Page 2 <br />toward generator status. U.S. EPA added that the weight of the container does not <br />need to be counted toward generator status. <br />CRA's request stems primarily from concern that "counting the weight of these non - <br />empty containers towards generator status almost ensures that many pharmacies will <br />become higher level hazardous waste generators." <br />RATIONALE FOR REGULATORY APPROACH. <br />CRA recommends that DTSC follow recent U.S. EPA guidance which "consistently <br />supports] the intent of the [federal] regulations to only regulate the residue in the <br />container, not the container itself." <br />In reviewing CRA's recommendation, DTSC agrees that U.S. EPA's 2011 memorandum <br />is more consistent with federal hazardous waste regulations applicable to containers. <br />As was stated in that letter, if a container holding an acute hazardous waste is not <br />emptied as specified in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), section 261.7(b)(3) "... <br />is not considered RCRA empty even though the pharmaceutical is fully dispensed. If <br />the container is not RCRA empty then the residues, [as specified in 40 Code of Federal <br />Regulations, section 261.33(c)] are regulated as hazardous waste." <br />Furthermore, this approach Is consistent with other criteria in federal regulations. The <br />federal container requirement states the following in 40 Code of Federal Regulation, <br />section 261.7(a)(2) concerning non -empty containers. <br />`Any hazardous waste in either a container that is not empty <br />or an inner liner <br />removed from a container that is not empty, as defined in paragraph tb) of this <br />section, is subject to regulation underparts 269 through 268, 270 and 924 of this <br />chapter and to the notification requirements of section 3090 of RCRA." <br />Under this requirement, it was not U.S, EPA's intent to regulate the container itself but <br />only the hazardous waste within, i.e., the acute hazardous waste residue remaining in <br />the container. <br />However, DTSC cannot apply the 2011 memorandum in California because it is <br />inconsistent with DTSC's hazardous waste regulations applicable to contaminated <br />containers. When DTSC adopted regulations for contaminated containers, it did not <br />adopt U.S. EPA's approach of addressing only the residues inside the containers. <br />Instead, DTSC adopted container regulations that consider the whole contaminated <br />container hazardous waste and not just the residual inside. California Code of <br />Regulations, title 22, section 66261.7(r) states: <br />