SR0084717_SSNL - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

118 Part i california Water and management that affect tribal lands, and groundwater overdraft. Some tribes have significantly affected FERC relicensing proceedings for hydroelectric projects by identifying traditional cultural properties and Indian trust asset lands within the project vicinity.47 Tribes also have called for a more active role in regional water planning processes, adjudications, and agreements (California Tribal Water Summit Regional Tribal Water Plenary 2009). Stakeholder associations Stakeholder associations representing various interests significantly influence California’s water policies. Historically, farm groups, urban water agencies, associations of water agencies and contractors, and environmental organi- zations have played a leading role, but business, recreation, and community organizations have also often demonstrated their interest.48 Interest group orga- nizations influence policies and management in various ways, most notably by providing data and information to decisionmakers, lobbying, placing initiatives on the ballot, and initiating lawsuits. Since the introduction of term limits in the California legislature in the early 1990s, stakeholder associations have gained more direct influence on the legislative process, both as a source of expertise and as crafters of legislation (Cain and Kousser 2004). California residents: water users and ballot box policymakers As water and land users, the state’s residents clearly have an important, direct influence on a range of water policy outcomes. For example, the effectiveness of water conservation incentives, the volume of contaminants that enter storm drains, and the extent of uninsured flood risk exposure all depend on individual actions. The views of the general public also can sway the decisions of legisla- tures, administrative agencies, and local governments. California residents are also frequently asked to make policy directly at the ballot box, by voting on policy initiatives and approving spending proposals. 47. Agencies and licensees must take into account the effect of their project on these properties (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 2004). 48. For instance, in the early 1990s, the Bay Area Economic Forum promoted the development of water marketing. In the mid-1990s, business leaders were also active in negotiations leading up to the Bay-Delta Accord (Chapter 1). In 2001, the California Building Industry Association played an important role in negotiations surrounding the passage of the “show me the water” laws (SB 610 and SB 221) (Association of California Water Agencies 2002). Environmental preservation, recreational fishing, bird-watching, rafting, and other nongovernmental organizations representing specific interests are prominent in California water policy discussions at local, state, and national levels.