SU0014691 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Item No. PC: 11-7-85 SU -84-7 Page 1 RECOMMENDATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION The request is to change conditions of a Major Subdivision. The request was filed under Section 9-9106, which allows for a change in conditions when the requirement or conditions of approval of the Tentative Map are not reasonable or are in need of clarifica- tion. The approving body may, upon written application of the subdivider or owner, modify such request, requirement or condition. BACKGROUND On August 2, 1984 the Planning Commission conditionally approved the Subdivision. Dave Olmstead, representing the applicant, appealed a condition requiring conditional drainage. The Board of Supervisors, at its meeting of October 25, 1984, referred the application back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration of storm drainage. From October 25, 1984 to June 6, 1985 the applicant worked with the Department of Public Works to revise storm drainage requirements. On June 6, 1985 the Planning Commission heard the Subdivision application and considered the matter of storm drainage. The Commission approved the Sub- division with community ponding as the method of storm drainage. The applicant appealed the Commission's action to the Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors, on July 23, 1985 approved drainage by individual ponding rather than by community ponding. The applicant is now requesting reconsideration regarding improve- ments to Fairoaks Road. The applicant's opinion is that the Commission did not require improvements along Fairoaks Road as stated in the condition approved by the Commission October 2, 1984, in Condition 2 (j). See the attached list of conditions. This condition states that full street width improvements are required on the Subdivision side in compliance with County stan- dards with a ten foot setback along the right-of-way. The right- of-way for Fairoaks Road is projected at 60'. Therefore, the 10' dedication should be 5' rather than 10'. It should be -a, dedication. The applicant and staff have reviewed the tape of the meeting of August 2, 1984. Staff's opinion is that there should be a dedi- cation of 5' along Fairoaks Drive, and that the Fairoaks Road should be brought up to County standards on the Subdivision side. The applicant does not agree with this opinion. Section 9-9340 states, in part, that whenever a Subdivision includes or is adjacent to any part of the public roadway, the