My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014580
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
14720
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
S-81-11
>
SU0014580
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2022 2:01:51 PM
Creation date
2/24/2022 1:38:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014580
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
S-81-11
STREET_NUMBER
14720
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
APN
05516031
ENTERED_DATE
12/9/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
14720 N THORNTON RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\jcastaneda
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEVELOPMENT OF A RATIONAL <br /> DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR <br /> OVERLAND FLOW SYSTEMS <br /> C.J. Martel, T.F. Jenkins, C.J. Diener and P.L. Butler <br /> INTRODUCTION <br /> Background <br /> An overland flow system consists of a series of <br /> grassy terraces which are carefully graded so that L <br /> wastewater flows downslope in a thin sheet. Gated <br /> pipe, slotted troughs, or sprinklers are used to uni- r q ' <br /> formly distribute the wastewater at the top of each <br /> terrace,and a ditch or channel collects the runoff <br /> at the base of the terrace (Fig. 1). When properly s <br /> designed and managed, the quality of runoff from <br /> an overland flow system can easily meet secondary <br /> effluent standards. <br /> Unlike most wastewater treatment systems, <br /> overland flow reduces the volume of water to be _. <br /> discharged. This reduction in volume is caused by Figure 1. Concept drawing of overland flow system <br /> losses through evapotranspiration and percolation (where L is terrace length, q average overland flow <br /> as wastewater flows over the soil surface. Typically, rate and s the slope), <br /> the volume of runoff is 60 to 90%of that applied. <br /> Consequently, removal efficiency should be calcu- an economical return in the form of high quality <br /> lated on a mass rather than concentration basis. forage crops. Palazzo et al. (in prep.)estimated the <br /> Overland flow systems offer a number of ad- value of this crop to be $858 ha' per year. <br /> vantages over conventional treatment. First and In spite of these advantages,not many overland <br /> foremost is the lower cost of operation and main- flow systems have been built. One of the main <br /> tenance. Highly skilled personnel are not needed reasons is the lack of a rational procedure for design. <br /> to run the facility and energy requirements are The procedure presented in U.S. EPA (1977) is based <br /> significantly lower (Middlebrooks and Middlebrooks on general guidelines which are difficult for inexper- <br /> 1979). Overland flow systems are also very reliable ienced engineers to interpret. For example,when <br /> and able to withstand large variations in strength untreated or primary effluent is applied, the designer <br /> of applied wastewater without system upset (Aly is advised to select a hydraulic loading rate within a <br /> et al. 1979). Another important advantage is that range of 6.4 to 20 cm wk-1,depending on climate, <br /> no sludge is produced except by pretreatment degree of treatment and detention time. Without <br /> processes. Overland flow systems can also provide previous experience it is difficult for the designer to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.