Laserfiche WebLink
DEVELOPMENT OF A RATIONAL <br /> DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR <br /> OVERLAND FLOW SYSTEMS <br /> C.J. Martel, T.F. Jenkins, C.J. Diener and P.L. Butler <br /> INTRODUCTION <br /> Background <br /> An overland flow system consists of a series of <br /> grassy terraces which are carefully graded so that L <br /> wastewater flows downslope in a thin sheet. Gated <br /> pipe, slotted troughs, or sprinklers are used to uni- r q ' <br /> formly distribute the wastewater at the top of each <br /> terrace,and a ditch or channel collects the runoff <br /> at the base of the terrace (Fig. 1). When properly s <br /> designed and managed, the quality of runoff from <br /> an overland flow system can easily meet secondary <br /> effluent standards. <br /> Unlike most wastewater treatment systems, <br /> overland flow reduces the volume of water to be _. <br /> discharged. This reduction in volume is caused by Figure 1. Concept drawing of overland flow system <br /> losses through evapotranspiration and percolation (where L is terrace length, q average overland flow <br /> as wastewater flows over the soil surface. Typically, rate and s the slope), <br /> the volume of runoff is 60 to 90%of that applied. <br /> Consequently, removal efficiency should be calcu- an economical return in the form of high quality <br /> lated on a mass rather than concentration basis. forage crops. Palazzo et al. (in prep.)estimated the <br /> Overland flow systems offer a number of ad- value of this crop to be $858 ha' per year. <br /> vantages over conventional treatment. First and In spite of these advantages,not many overland <br /> foremost is the lower cost of operation and main- flow systems have been built. One of the main <br /> tenance. Highly skilled personnel are not needed reasons is the lack of a rational procedure for design. <br /> to run the facility and energy requirements are The procedure presented in U.S. EPA (1977) is based <br /> significantly lower (Middlebrooks and Middlebrooks on general guidelines which are difficult for inexper- <br /> 1979). Overland flow systems are also very reliable ienced engineers to interpret. For example,when <br /> and able to withstand large variations in strength untreated or primary effluent is applied, the designer <br /> of applied wastewater without system upset (Aly is advised to select a hydraulic loading rate within a <br /> et al. 1979). Another important advantage is that range of 6.4 to 20 cm wk-1,depending on climate, <br /> no sludge is produced except by pretreatment degree of treatment and detention time. Without <br /> processes. Overland flow systems can also provide previous experience it is difficult for the designer to <br />