Laserfiche WebLink
Table 3. Measured and predicted detention times. <br /> Average" MOaswred Predicted _ <br /> Application overland detention detention _ oT. <br /> Location rate fiowrate Slope time, Tp time, Tp Tp-Tm <br /> and dote (m' h(-') (m' hr' m') (95) (mini (min) (min) <br /> Utica,Miss. <br /> 13 July 78 0.584 .0.097 4 75 108 33 <br /> 14 July 78 0.584 0.097 4 60 108 43 <br /> 21 July 78 0.584 0.097 4 75 108 33 <br /> 21 July 78 0.584 0.097 4 90 108 18 <br /> 20 July 78 0.435 0.072 4 130 146 16 <br /> 2 Aug 78 0.292 0.049 8 255 170 -45 <br /> 2 Aug 78 0.292 0.049 8 255 170 -95 <br /> 3 Aug 78 0.435 0.072 8 150 - 116 -Y4 <br /> 3 Aug 78 0.435 0.072 8 165 116 -49 <br /> 17 Aug 78 0.435 0.072 8 120 116 - 4 <br /> 17 Aug 78, 0.435 0.072 8 135' 116 =18 <br /> 17 Aug 78 0.435 0.072 2 165 184 19 <br /> 17 Aug 78 0.435 0.072 2 ISO 184 36 - <br /> 31 Jan 79 0.435 0.072 2 135 157 22 . .. - <br /> 31 Jan 79 0.435 0.072 2 150 157 7 <br /> 8 Feb 79 0.435 0.072 2 165 157 8 <br /> 25 Jan 79 0.435 0.072 8 120 99 -21 <br /> 2 Feb 79 0.435 0.072 8 105 99 - 6 <br /> 2 Feb 79 0.435 0.072 8 165 99 -66 <br /> 10 Feb 79 0.435 0.072 8 96 99 3 <br /> 10 Feb 79 0.435 0.072 8 135 99 -36 - <br /> 24 Jan 79 0.584 0.113 4 105 93 -12 <br /> 15 May 79 1.753 0.292 2 90 45 -45 <br /> 22 May 79 0.435 0.072 2 330 184 -146 <br /> Aug 79 1.753 0.292 4 50 36 -14 <br /> Aug 79 0.876 0.146 4 135 72 -63 <br /> Aug 79 1.753 0.292 4 65 36 -29 <br /> Aug 79 1.753 0.292 8 48 29 -19 <br /> 11 Feb 80 0.219 0.042 2 207 314 107 <br /> 12 Feb 80 0.435 0.084 2 112 157 45 <br /> 12 Feb 80 0.435 0.084 2 120 157 37 <br /> 12 Feb 80 0.435 0.084 8 90 98 8 <br /> 12 Feb 80 0.435 0.084 8 75 98 23 <br /> 13 Feb 80 0.876 0.169 2 75 78 3 <br /> 13 Feb 80 0.876 0.169 2 75 78 3 <br /> 13 Feb 80 0.876 0.169 8 60 49 -11 <br /> 13 Feb 80 0.876 0.169 8 60 49 -11 <br /> i <br /> U.Orcalif., Uavis <br /> 0.118 0.079 4 21 17 - 3 <br /> 0.236 0.157 4 13 9 - 4 <br /> 0.345 0.236 4 11 6 - 5 <br /> n 40 <br /> mean 8 <br /> std.dev. 43 <br /> "At Utica,0.75 and 0.87 were used as overland flow coefficients for summer and winter respec- <br /> tively. A runoff coefficient of 1.0 was used at U.of Calif.,Davis. <br /> 8 <br />