|
Al2 REGIONAL AQUIFE"YSTEM ANALYSIS—CENTRAL VALLEY,CALIFORNIA
<br /> limits that an Error in estimating their thickness has no Chico (Page, 1986, fig. 8), at depths from 640 to 900 €t,
<br /> effect on the flow-system analysis. I and along the southwest flank of the Sacramento Valley
<br /> north of Cache Creek in T.3 N.,at depths from about 600
<br /> to 2,700 ft (Page, 1986, figs. 844).
<br /> WATER-SEARING CHARACTERISTICS OF Relating aquifers within the post-Eocene continental
<br /> THE AQUIFER SYSTEM deposits to pecific formations in the subsurface is
<br /> (POST-EOCENE CONTINENTAL DEPOSITS) difficult. In the valley, investigators use mainly physiog-
<br /> raphy,weathering characteristics,and soils to map upper
<br /> The post-Eocene continental deposits that constitute Cenozoic formations; however, in the subsurface, espe-
<br /> the Central Valley aquifer system contain mostly fluvial cially under saturated conditions, equivalents of surface
<br /> deposits and interbedded la.custrine deposits but include units cannot be mapped with any certainty because
<br /> some volcanic material. The continental deposits consist differences in lithology are not apparent. In the Central
<br /> predominantly of lenses of gravel, sand, silt, and clay. Valley, then,physical properties of the aquifer materials
<br /> The numerous lenses of fine-grained (silt, sandy silt, and the distribution of these properties are more impor-
<br /> sandy clay, and clay) sediments are distributed through- tant than the delineation of formation boundaries to
<br /> out the valley and in most places constitute over 54 understanding regional and local flow patterns and to
<br /> percent of the total thickness penetrated by wells, as quantifying water in storage.The general relations in the
<br /> determined from electric logy; (Page, 1986). Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys among geologic
<br /> Most of these fine-grained lenses are not areally i units, hydrologic units, and layers used in the computer
<br /> extensive; however, several major ones were mapped, simulation of ground-water flow are shown in figure 9.
<br /> principally near the axis of the San Joaquin Valley. The
<br /> most notable is the Corcoran Clay Member(Pleistocene)
<br /> of the Tulare Formation (Pliocene and Pleistocene), STORAGE COEFFICIENT
<br /> which is part of the modified E-clay of Page (1986) and
<br /> underlies most of the west side of the San Joaquin Valley. Storage coefficient is the amount of water that can be
<br /> This diatomaceous clay unit underlies an area of approx- released from or added to the ground-water reservoir. It
<br /> imately 5,000 min (Page, 1986) and ranges in thickness is usually defined as the volume of water an aquifer
<br /> from near sero to at least 160 ft beneath the present bed system releases from or takes into storage per unit
<br /> of Tulare Lake(Davis and others, 1959;Page, 1986). The surface area of aquifer per unit change in head(Lohman
<br /> northern extent of the Corcoran Clay Member is not and others, 1972, p. 8). In the zone of water-table
<br /> known because of the lack of well data north of Stockton, fluctuations, the storage coefficient is virtually equal to
<br /> particularly in the Delta area, A diatomaceous clay the amount of water released from storage by gravity
<br /> similar in composition to that of the Corcoran Claydrainage, referred to as specific yield. Below the zone of
<br /> Member was present in a test hole drilled northwest of water-table fluctuations, the storage coefficient is the
<br /> Sacramento, and drillers have filed reports showing a amount of water released by compression of the sedi-
<br /> diatomaceous clay in several deeper wells north of ments and expansion of the water.This amount is usually
<br /> Stockton (Page and Bertoldi, 1983). Laboratory tests of much less than the amount released by gravity drainage.
<br /> the clay indicate that it is highly susceptible to compac- Laboratory values of specific yield and porosity are
<br /> tion, like the Corcoran Clay Member; however, the clay shown in table 1- For the purposes of uniformity, only
<br /> was not present in six other test holes northwest of reported values obtained by the "sample saturation and
<br /> Sacramento, so the full extent of it is not known. drainage" method described by Johnson (1967, P. D5)
<br /> The Corcoran Clay Member is important to the hy- were used in table 1. In general, sand yields more water
<br /> draulics of the aquifer system in that prior to develop- from gravity drainage than fine-grained deposits like silt
<br /> ment it acted as an effective confining unit. However, the and clay, even though the porosities are nearly the same.
<br /> drilling of large-diameter wells through the Corcoran and The fine-grained deposits usually have much smaller
<br /> the practice of perforating wells both above and below it specific-,yield values because the tiny pores do not drain
<br /> have made the present effectiveness of the Corcoran as a readily.
<br /> confining unit questionable. Williamson and others (1989, table 7) used specific-
<br /> In the basis of drillers'logs,electric logs from gas wells yield values for aquifer materials similar to those shown
<br /> and the water wells, plus information from seven U.S. in table 1 and then estimated an aggregated specific yield
<br /> Geological Survey test holes drilled as part of this study, for the first few hundred feet of saturated sediment on
<br /> Page (1986) concluded that no extensive fine-grained the basis of lithologic descriptions from about 17,000 well
<br /> lenses underlie the Sacramento Valley. However, there logs. They estimated an average specific yield of 7
<br /> are two areas of mostly fire-grained sediments interbed- percent for the Sacramento Valley, 8 percent for the
<br /> ded with coarse-grained sediments along the northeast Delta area,and 10 percent for the San Joaquin Valley and
<br /> flank of the Sacramento Valley adjacent to and south of Tulare Basin.
<br />
|