Laserfiche WebLink
GROUND WATER IN THE CENTRAL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA A21 <br /> withdrawals of ground water from the west side of the the amount of regional flow, it has also decreased the <br /> San Joaquin Valley have profoundly affected hydraulic amount of water in storage and caused the land surface to <br /> gradients and flow patterns there. The heads in the lower subside over a large area. These effects are discussed in <br /> zone (originally above land surface) are now below sea the section"Effects of Ground-Water Withdrawal on the <br /> level and the direction of lateral ground-water flow has Central Valley Aquifer System." <br /> been reversed(Bull and Miller, 1975). Water in the lower <br /> zone previously flowed toward the center of the valley GROUND WATER IN STORAGE <br /> and discharged in the slough near the San Joaquin River <br /> (fig. 14). However,by the 1960's,flow was mostly toward The quantity of water in storage in the aquifers of the <br /> the pumping center on the west side of the valley. Central Valley has been estimated by several investiga- <br /> The total flow through the aquifer system has in- tors. All such estimates are based on use of average <br /> creased from about 2 million acre-ft/yr prior to develop- values of specific yield for different lithologies and an <br /> ment to nearly 12 million acre-ft/yr after development arbitrary thickness of the aquifer system. Earlier inves- <br /> (Williamson and others, 1989). The increased pumpage is tigators restricted their estimates to the shallow part of <br /> supplied largely by increased recharge, mostly from the aquifer system. Olmsted and Davis (1961) estimated <br /> imported surface water or recirculated pumped water. I that there were 28 million acre-ft of water in storage in <br /> Increased pumpage of ground water has not only changed the upper 200 ft of sediments in the Sacramento Valley. <br /> SOUTHWEST NORTHEAST <br /> FEET � <br /> 2,000 e <br /> m a <br /> � 5 0 <br /> y <br /> iti tl U5 <br /> 1,000 Potentiometric surface, rz <br /> lower zone,1906 I I <br /> Sea �~ ��—— _� ——— — f� ._ — .- .- ✓ <br /> levelUppeBasg <br /> r zone <br /> Corcoran Clay Member <br /> th=Tulare For'ation f <br /> 1,000 Lower zone of trg' <br /> A VERTICAL EXAGGERATION X 20 <br /> 2,000 <br /> SOUTHWEST NORTHEAST <br /> d <br /> FEET <br /> 2,000 <br /> K <br /> o � <br /> tl � <br /> 1,000 Potentiometric surface, n <br /> lower zone,1966 co <br /> I I � <br /> Sea Upper zone . { <br /> level <br /> 7Lower <br /> X—Corcoran Clay Member <br /> of the Tulare Formation1,000 � Basg of fresh Hatet .� <br /> B VERTICAL EXAGGERATION X 20 <br /> 2,000- <br /> 0 5 10 MILES <br /> 0 5 10 KILOMETERS <br /> FIGURE 14.—Predevelopment and current ground-water flow conditions(shown by arrows)in the San Joaquin Valley(from Bull and Miller, <br /> 1975, fig. 20). A, About 1900. B, 1966. <br />