My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0085141_SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
17650
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0085141_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2022 2:46:54 PM
Creation date
4/14/2022 1:34:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0085141
PE
2602
FACILITY_NAME
JOSE VALDOVINOS
STREET_NUMBER
17650
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20820015
ENTERED_DATE
4/13/2022 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17650 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
351
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
74 Part I California Water <br /> Very little indoor water use is net use,unless the resulting wastewater is discharged <br /> to the sea.Most(but not all)landscape and agricultural irrigation becomes net <br /> water use,as it evapotranspires to the atmosphere. <br /> Net use can never exceed gross use.But because recoverable flow is often reused, <br /> total gross water use usually exceeds total flow into a region.This can be seen by <br /> comparing average statewide gross water use(about 83 maf/year)with the total <br /> available supplies over the same period(71 maf/year)(Table 2.1). <br /> Conservation actions often target reductions in gross water use.But only net <br /> water savings provide more water(Ward and Pulido-Velazquez 2008;Clemmens, <br /> Allen,and Burt 2008;Huffaker 2008;Hanak et al.2010;CALFED 2006;Scheierling, <br /> Young,and Cardon 2006).In agriculture,achieving significant net water savings <br /> generally requires switching to crops that consume less water or reducing irrigated <br /> land area.By contrast,irrigation efficiency investments may reduce gross water <br /> use per acre but increase net water use on farms by making it easier for farmers to <br /> stretch their gross supplies across additional acres of cropland.Reductions in net <br /> water use by agriculture usually imply reductions in agricultural production(Perry <br /> et al.2009). <br /> Even when they do not result in lower net use,reductions in water withdrawals <br /> from streams and groundwater basins can have environmental benefits,including <br /> improved stream flow;reduced pollution runoff into rivers,streams,and beaches <br /> (Noble et al.2003);and reduced energy use and costs for acquiring and treating <br /> water(California Energy Commission 2005).For example,a major means of manag- <br /> ing soil and aquifer salinization in the southern Central Valley has been to improve <br /> irrigation efficiencies,so that less salt-laden water from the Delta is applied to fields. <br /> Even though these irrigation improvements make little net water available for use, <br /> the resulting runoff is of better quality. <br /> and Tulare Basin, and 20 times as high as local runoff in the and Colorado <br /> River region(Figure 2.1). <br /> Water availability also varies by season and between years. California's <br /> Mediterranean climate has wet winters and very dry summers,reflected in the <br /> monthly variations in the Sacramento River's natural stream flow(Figure 2.2), <br /> the state's largest river. The historical record also shows both very wet years, <br /> often with substantial floods, and long multiyear droughts (Figure 2.3). The <br /> geologic record of the past 2,000 years shows even larger and longer droughts <br /> (Stine 1994). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.