My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0085141_SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
17650
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0085141_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2022 2:46:54 PM
Creation date
4/14/2022 1:34:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0085141
PE
2602
FACILITY_NAME
JOSE VALDOVINOS
STREET_NUMBER
17650
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20820015
ENTERED_DATE
4/13/2022 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17650 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
351
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
78 Part I California Water <br /> and one-fifth of surface water).'Small,but locally important,amounts of water <br /> are derived from other sources, including recycled wastewater and brackish <br /> water desalination. <br /> The state's primary imported water source is the Colorado River,which now <br /> provides 4.4 maf/year,California's allotment under the federal law that appor- <br /> tions Colorado River water among Arizona, California, and Nevada. These <br /> supplies have diminished from a high of 5.1 maf/year in the late 1990s and <br /> early 2000s as other states'demands have grown,limiting California's ability to <br /> draw on their allotments.2 Although supplies on the Colorado are also variable <br /> (and expected to diminish over time),'California's Colorado River entitlement <br /> is stable.Other interstate flows are relatively small and affect only local basins <br /> in the eastern Sierra Nevada and upper Klamath Basin. <br /> Much of California's runoff flows into the groundwater basins that underlie most <br /> of California's land area,where it often becomes a major source of water supply. <br /> Over the eight-year period shown in Table 2.1,groundwater pumps withdrew an <br /> average of 15 maf/year and accounted for 28 to 42 percent of gross agricultural and <br /> urban water use.Groundwater is more important in dry years and is particularly <br /> important for agricultural and urban uses in several regions(Figure 2.5).Most of <br /> this water is regularly replenished with irrigation water,artificial recharge (from <br /> managed recharge basins),seepage from stream flow,and precipitation. <br /> However, in some regions more water is pumped out of basins than is <br /> replenished over many years;this is known as overdraft. Chronic overdraft— <br /> essentially groundwater mining—could be as high as 2 maf/year on average state- <br /> wide(California Department of Water Resources 2009).As much as 1.4 maf/year <br /> of overdraft occurs from agricultural uses in the Tulare Basin(Kern,Tulare,and <br /> Kings Counties)(U.S.Geological Survey 2009).In the Central Coast,the Salinas <br /> Basin also suffers from chronic groundwater overdraft(about 19 taf/year[thou- <br /> sand acre-feet per year]),largely from agricultural pumping(Monterey County <br /> Water Resources Agency 2001; California Department of Water Resources <br /> 1995a).Although groundwater mining can help meet demands during droughts, <br /> it is an ultimately unsustainable water source(Harou and Lund 2008). <br /> 1. Over the 1998 to 2005 period,surface water reuse ranged from 8 to 15 maf/year and aquifer recharge ranged from <br /> 5 to 7 maf/year. <br /> 2. As discussed in Chapters 4 and 6,a variety of conservation and water transfer arrangements,known collectively <br /> as the Quantification Settlement Agreement of 2003,were developed to help wean California off these surplus water <br /> supplies from the Colorado River. <br /> 3. On projected declines in Colorado River supplies,see Barnett et al.(2008)and Rajagopalan et al.(2009).Although <br /> there is general agreement that supplies are likely to diminish with climate change,there is debate about the likely timing <br /> and the extent to which improved water management can forestall extreme shortages of supplies. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.