My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0000241
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DUNCAN
>
4545
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
MS-88-93
>
SU0000241
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2022 3:45:14 PM
Creation date
5/13/2022 1:33:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0000241
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
MS-88-93
STREET_NUMBER
4545
STREET_NAME
DUNCAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
ENTERED_DATE
9/18/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
4545 DUNCAN RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
On June 23 , 1988 , Bob Celum filed an appeal of the Planning <br /> Commission' s denial of this project . <br /> BASES FOR APPEAL : <br /> In his appeal , Mr. Celum makes the following points: <br /> 1 . The church use is not an intensive urban type use , and it will not <br /> conflict with existing agricultural operations in the area. The <br /> church will only be used for approximately three hours on Sundays <br /> and occasionally during mid-week for meetings. Additionally, the <br /> facility will be fenced and landscaped to minimize the effects of <br /> this type of use in a predominantly agricultural area. <br /> 2 . The project is not growth inducing and will not serve as the impe- <br /> tus for additional urban type growth in this area. After looking <br /> for a church site within the community of Linden for several <br /> years , this appears to be the best available site. Although this <br /> project will result in the loss of a small amount of farm land, <br /> any other site located in this general area would have the same <br /> result . <br /> Based upon these comments, Mr. Celum states that Use Permit Findings <br /> No. 1 and 4 can be made, as the use is not anticipated to conflict <br /> with agricultural uses, nor is the project expected to encourage addi- <br /> tional urban type growth in this area. <br /> ANALYSIS OF THE APPEAL: <br /> Response to Comment No. 1 : <br /> It was determined by staff and three members of the Planning <br /> Commission that locating the church at this site would constitute an <br /> intrusion into an agricultural area and result in related land use <br /> conflicts between agricultural uses and the church use. <br /> Response to Comment No. 2 : <br /> It was determined by staff and three members of the Planning <br /> Commission that locating the church at this site may be growth <br /> inducing and may serve as the impetus for future urban type develop- <br /> ment in the area south of State Route 26 between the proposed church <br /> and the community of Linden. This area is also comprised of prime <br /> agricultural soils, and this project will result in the loss of prime <br /> farm land. Should this project serve to induce additional growth in <br /> the area between the church facility and Linden, additional prime farm <br /> land will be lost . <br /> FISCAL IMPACT: <br /> None. <br /> BOS LETTER PAGE 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.