Laserfiche WebLink
21 October 2020 <br />Project No. 14-3002 <br />Page 13 of 15 <br />samples analyzed. <br /> TPH-d were detected in the groundwater samples collected from B46, B48, B65 <br />and B79 at concentrations of 150 micrograms per liter (µg/l), 98 µg/l, 1,000 µg/l <br />and 330 µg/l, respectively. TPH-d concentrations detected from B65 and B79 <br />exceed the MCL Priority of 200 µg/l. <br /> TPH-mo were detected in the groundwater samples collected from B46, B48, B65 <br />and B79 at concentrations of 460 µg/l, 380 µg/l, 6,100 µg/l and 760 µg/l, <br />respectively. There is no established MCL Priority for TPH-mo. <br /> Total lead was detected in groundwater samples from B46, B48 and B65 at <br />concentrations of 0.37 milligrams per liter (mg/l), 0.00075 mg/l and 0.017 mg/l, <br />respectively. The concentrations exceed the MCL of 0.015 mg/l. However, the <br />samples were inadvertently analyzed for total lead and not dissolved lead. <br /> Dioxins/Furans were detected in the groundwater samples collected from B46, B48 <br />and B65 at TEQ concentrations of 0.723 picograms per liter (pg/l), 2.41 pg/l, and <br />0.0126 pg/l, respectively. The concentrations detected were significantly below the <br />MCL of 30 pg/l for dioxin/furans. <br /> <br />Analytical results of groundwater samples are summarized in Table 8. The laboratory <br />reports (listed in Section 5.3.), QA/QC reports and chain of custody forms are included in <br />Appendix D. Laboratory EDF files were QA/QC checked and uploaded to the State Water <br />Board GeoTracker site. <br /> <br /> <br />6.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />Based upon the environmental activities completed, AGI provides the following summary <br />and conclusions: <br /> Lithology at the site consists of silty sand and sand from near surface grade to <br />approximately 14 feet bsg (18 feet bsg in the former power plant area) and clay <br />from 14 to 15 feet bsg (between 18 and 20 feet bsg in the former power plant area). <br />In most borings, silty sand grades into poorly graded sand between approximately <br />9 and 14 feet bsg. Groundwater was generally encountered in the poorly graded <br />sands between 10 and 11 feet bsg and between 14 and 15 feet bsg in the former <br />power plant area. The surface elevation of the former power plant area is <br />approximately 3.5 to 5.0 feet higher than the surrounding area. <br /> Two additional waste cell areas were identified at the site: 1) Waste Cell No. 1A is <br />located near the eastern property boundary and appears to be the continuation of <br />the South Waste Cell. However, Waste Cell No. 1A is discontinuous from the South <br />Waste Cell. Waste was not encountered along the property boundary within the <br />benched/sloped area of the stormwater retention basin. Waste Cell No. 1A is <br />approximately 1,200 square feet with waste observed between four (4) and ten <br />(10) feet bsg. The waste cell is fully defined (Figure 3). Waste Cell No. 2A is located