Laserfiche WebLink
District CEQA Reference No: 20200052 <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />ii) The following policies/mitigation measures are recommended to mitigate <br />potential health impacts of individual projects: <br />(1) Development projects resulting in toxic air contaminant emissions will be <br />located an adequate distance from residential areas and other sensitive <br />receptors in accordance to ARB's Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A <br />Community Health Perspective. <br />(2) A health risk screening and/or assessment will be performed to assess <br />potential risks to sensitive receptors for the following projects: <br />(3) Projects whose proposed locations are within the established buffer <br />distances identified in ARB's handbook; <br />(4) Projects whose land uses are not specifically identified in ARB's handbook <br />(such as shopping centers), but there is sufficient information to reasonably <br />conclude that sensitive receptors would be exposed to significant sources <br />of toxic air contaminants; and <br />(5) Projects that would otherwise appear to be exempt from CEQA <br />requirements, but there is sufficient information to reasonably conclude that <br />sensitive receptors would be exposed to significant sources of toxic air <br />contaminants, such as industrial use projects allowed by right. <br />d) A discussion of whether the Project would result in a cumulatively considerable net <br />increase of any criteria pollutant or precursor for which the San Joaquin Valley Air <br />Basin is in non -attainment. More information on the District's attainment status <br />can be found online by visiting the District's website at: <br />http://valleyair.org/aginfo/attainment.htm. <br />e) As required by the recent decision in Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 <br />CalAt" 502, a reasonable effort to discuss relevant specifics regarding the <br />connection between potential adverse air quality impacts from the Project with the <br />likely nature and magnitude of potential health impacts. If the potential health <br />impacts from the Project cannot be specifically correlated, explain what is known <br />and why, given scientific constraints, potential health impacts cannot be translated. <br />Planning Commission Staff Report 55 <br />PA -1900240 (SA), PA -2000014 (ER), PA -2000019 (DA) <br />Response Letters <br />