Laserfiche WebLink
Patricia Leary - 4 - 16 January 2009 <br /> reported exceedances include turbidity and total coliform violations, occurring after the CDO <br /> time schedule for compliance passed, beginning 1 May 2008 through <br /> 31 September 2008. Other violations of final reclamation specifications include: total <br /> suspended solids, BOD, and pH. The list of violations is included with this memorandum as <br /> Attachment A. <br /> Several time schedule deadlines have passed without completion of the task by the <br /> Discharger. In addition to the failure to comply with the'l May 2008 compliance date <br /> prescribed for total coliform and turbidity, the Discharger has failed to submit.its Compliance <br /> i <br /> Workplan/Implementation Schedule, Pollution Prevention plans for all required constituents, <br /> and Progress Reports. It appears that the Discharger is still unable to meet reclamation <br /> specifications pursuant to its Order and CDO. <br /> MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM VIOLATIONS <br /> Additional violations of the Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP) defined in Attachment E <br /> of the Order include: <br /> 1. The Discharger has failed to report the average monthly percent removal for BOD and <br /> TSS in its SMRs as prescribed by IV.C.2: <br /> "2. Percent Removal: The average monthly percent removal of BOD 5-day at <br /> 20°C and total suspended solids shall not be less than 85 percent" <br /> 2. As shown by the frequent occurrences of reclamation specification exceedances, the <br /> Discharger is in violation of the. Construction, Operation, and Maintenance <br /> Specifications, Section C.5.a.i, which requires: <br /> "Wastewater shall be oxidized, disinfected, and in this situation filtered (to assure <br /> effectiveness of the ozone disinfection process) or equivalent pursuant to DHS <br /> criteria for the use of recycled water ata Golf Course with restricted access in <br /> i <br /> Title 22, CCR, Division 4, Chapter 3 (Title 22)." <br /> 3. The.applicable Minimum Level and the current Method Detection Limit are not provided <br /> in the Discharger's SMRs for any of the constituents. <br /> i <br /> VI.B. MRP Requirements, X.B.7 <br /> "The Discharger shall report with each sample result the applicable Minimum <br /> Level (ML) and the current Method Detection Limit(MDL), as determined by the <br /> procedure in 40 CFR Part 936" <br /> i <br /> 4. While the Discharger provides a cover letter to its SMRs, the cover letters are deficient. <br /> to meet the requirements of the Order. The cover letters do not: (1) clearly identify <br /> violations of the WDRs, (2) discuss corrective actions taken or planned, (3).provide a <br /> proposed time schedule for corrective actions, (4) include a description of the <br /> I requirement violated, and (5) include a description of the violation. <br /> + VI.B. MRP Requirements, X.B.8 <br />