Laserfiche WebLink
F <br /> SOIL SUITABILITY STUDY <br /> urrounding and On-site Septic System Information <br /> A review of Application Permits on file with the Environmental Health Department reveals there <br /> has been four Application for Repairs/Additions to septic systems within the on-half mile radius <br /> study area, on Linne Road exclusively. This can be considered a medium-to-high number of <br /> Repairs/Additions/Replacements considering that older systems (prior to 1999), seepage pits <br /> were installed in the underlying gravel strata which extraordinarily managed septic effluent <br /> flows. Seepage pits and sumps have been banned by the EHD in this southern region of Tracy <br /> due to nitrate impact partially originating from these structures. <br /> As referenced,the septic system that serves Mr. Rios' house is antiquated and in need of <br /> modernization. The septic tank is a small round structure. Consequently, Mike Huggins of EHD has <br /> stipulated that the residential septic system be tied into the new system to serve the proposed wpery. <br /> B. Soil Physical Test Results: <br /> Particle Size Analysis and Percolation Testing <br /> Soil testing was conducted on samples retrieved from a single, exploratory boring. The boring was <br /> drilled near the primary disposal area, as denoted on the Percolation Test Form. Physical and <br /> analytical chemistry testing were conducted on the samples obtained, discussed below. <br /> Particle Size Analysis was done on the three samples by A&L Laboratories of Modesto under the <br /> attached Chain of Custody. Laboratory USDA classifications reveal the soil underlying the <br /> proposed filter bed location to consist of a clay loam at 0 - 6 inches in depth, a loam at 24 inches in <br /> depth and a clay loam at 42 inches in depth. In addition to USDA classifications, the Unified Soil <br /> Classification System describes the soil samples(also denoted on the Field Percolation Test Form) <br /> as silt(loam), and a lean clayey silt(clay loam), and a silt. These soil classifications are <br /> summarized in the Table 1, Page 4. <br /> The second physical test to be conducted was a percolation test in the location of the primary filter <br /> bed, as described: O 2005, one._per_Q.test bQdugo .4Zjnc=_and one deeper boring to 8.5 ft <br /> were drilled with a B-24 Mobile Drill Rig. The deeper boring was drilled to the north of the <br /> proposed filter bed area and terminated at 8.5 ft in depth. T ' borin was drilled onl to determine <br /> t,__he depth of the area-wide gravel stratum. The boring was then backfilled with soil cuttings. <br /> Sidewalls of the 42 inch boring was scored with a pry-bar and the loose material removed with a <br /> hand auger. Two inches of fine gravel was placed at the bottom and three-inch perforated PVC pipe <br /> was inserted into each hole. This test boring was pre-saturated with 12 inches of water, <br /> approximately 24 hours before the start of testing. No standing water remained after the pre-soak <br /> period. On May 5, 2005, percolation testing commenced for the shallow boring. The test boring was <br /> refilled to approximately six inches of head water and the percolation tests were conducted over a <br /> four-hour period to induce maximum soil saturation. Although EHD Test Procedure#1 could have <br /> been run since the six inches of water seeped away after the first 30 minutes, Test Procedure#2 was <br /> run to ensure maximum soil saturation cQ4di io under"wor$t case scenario'' onditions. <br /> I. <br /> .. <br /> Page -3- <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />