Laserfiche WebLink
30 June 2022 AdvancedGeo <br /> Project No. 22-6900 An Employee-Owned Company <br /> Page 14 of 15 <br /> wastewater recharge from the proposed septic system. The nitrogen loading value is <br /> slightly above the desired value of 10 ppm. <br /> 10.0. TOTAL NITRATE IMPACT FROM PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> Based on the method and assumptions described, proposed NO3_N mass of wastewater <br /> and the calculations of the NO3_N loading predicted, the proposed development may <br /> negatively impact NO3_N loading rates within the aquifer. The soil at the site appear to <br /> be adequate for nitrate degradation and proper leaching of wastewater. A total of <br /> 11.93 ppm of additional nitrogen is estimated to be added to the site over the long term <br /> through wastewater recharge from the proposed septic system. <br /> 11.0. MITIGATION METHODS PROPOSED <br /> To mitigate any known or potential future impacts of nitrate to soil and groundwater from <br /> the proposed septic system, the following mitigations could be implemented: <br /> • Maximize wastewater hold time where practical (retention) by installing a larger <br /> septic tank (2,000 gallons). <br /> • Avoid use of bioattenuation chemicals (bleach etc.). <br /> • Properly and regularly maintain the property septic system. <br /> • Use EHD criteria for sizing the septic disposal field. <br /> If re-location or expansion of leach fields becomes necessary, leach lines should include <br /> high organic substrates under and surrounding the lines installed. <br /> 12.0. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on this Soil Suitability and Nitrate Loading Study, AGI concludes the following: <br /> • The percolation rate meets the minimum EHD standards in the proposed septic <br /> system disposal field. <br /> • The nitrogen loading rate is slightly above the desired value of 10 ppm. <br /> • Installation of a septic tank that is larger than the minimum requirement to offset <br /> the elevated nitrate loading rate. <br /> • Nitrates were detected below the State of California Maximum Contaminant Level <br /> (MCL) in the onsite water well; and DBCP was not detected above the laboratory <br /> reporting limit. <br />