Laserfiche WebLink
Patricia Leary <br />16 January 2009 <br />reported exceedances include turbidity and total coliform violations, occurring after the CDO <br />time schedule for compliance passed, beginning 1 May 2008 through <br />.31 September 2008. Other violations of final reclamation specifications include: total <br />suspended solids, BOD, and pH. The list of violations is included with this memorandum as <br />Attachment A. <br />Several time schedule deadlines have passed without completion of the task by the <br />Discharger. In addition to the failure to comply with the"I May 2008 compliance date <br />prescribed for total coliform and turbidity, the Discharger has failed to submit.its Compliance <br />Workplan/Implementation Schedule, Pollution Prevention plans for all required constituents, <br />and Progress Reports. It appears that the Discharger is still unable to meet reclamation <br />specifications pursuant to its Order and CDO. <br />MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM VIOLATIONS <br />Additional violations of the Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP) defined in Attachment E <br />of the Order include: <br />1. The Discharger has failed to report the average monthly percent removal for BOD and <br />TSS in its SMRs as prescribed by IV.C.2: <br />7. Percent Removal: The average monthly percent removal of BOD 5 -day at <br />20°C and total suspended solids shall not be less than 85 percent. " <br />2. As shown by the frequent occurrences of reclamation specification exceedances, the <br />Discharger is in violation of the. Construction, Operation, and Maintenance <br />Specifications, Section C.5.a.i, which requires: <br />"Wastewater shall be oxidized, disinfected, and in this situation filtered (to assure <br />effectiveness of the ozone disinfection process) or equivalent pursuant to DHS <br />criteria for the use of recycled water at a Golf Course with restricted access in <br />Title 22, CCR, Division 4, Chapter 3 (Title 22)." <br />3. The. applicable Minimum Level and the current Method Detection Limit are not provided <br />in the Discharger's SMRs for any of the constituents. <br />VI.B. MRP Requirements, X.B.7 <br />"The Discharger shall report with each sample result the applicable Minimum <br />Level (ML) and the current Method Detection Limit (MDL), as determined by.the <br />procedure in 40 CFR Part 136" <br />4. While the Discharger provides a cover letter to its SMRs, the cover letters are deficient. <br />to meet the requirements of the Order. The cover letters do not: (1) clearly identify <br />violations of the WDRs, (2) discuss corrective actions taken or planned, (3). provide a <br />proposed time schedule for corrective actions, (4). include a description of the <br />requirement violated, and (5) include a description of the violation. <br />VI.B. MRP Requirements, X.B.8 <br />