Laserfiche WebLink
6.7 Discussion of any potentional problems predicted and/or the need for an engineered of- <br />alternative <br />ralternative septic system. In this area, the soils are classified as <br />6.8 Discussion of percolation rates in relation to the type, size and location of future leach <br />fields needed at the site. Based on the results of the percolation rate and the soils profile, it is <br />Dillon & Murphy's opinion that the subject proposed parcels are suited for a typical on-site sewage <br />disposal system. The systems should be properly designed and installed according to the current <br />San Joaquin County criteria for standard septic systems. <br />Based on the depth to groundwater in the area, and the size of the proposed parcels, it is our opinion <br />on that the installation of any new proposed septic system, if property installed, should not <br />adversely affect the quality of groundwater in the area. <br />7.0 CONCLUSION SECTION <br />The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the proposed <br />development, the use of the subject property, and the site conditions as they existed at the time we <br />excavated our test hole and performed the percolation test. It was assumed that the test hole and <br />percolation test results are representative of the subsurface conditions in the general area. <br />Our services were performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions proposed in accordance <br />with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. The warranty is in lieu of all other <br />warranties either expressed or implied. Test findings and statements of professional opinion do <br />not constitute a guarantee or warranty, expressed or implied. <br />\N,/, Nil I <br />Joeurphy <br />R.C. . 45277 <br />FIE <br />. <br />I.45277 <br />D(P. 9-30-22 a <br />Civil, <br />