Laserfiche WebLink
5 � <br /> } <br /> R 1 5 1992 <br /> Mr. Ed Padilla -2- , T 10 April 1992 <br /> HEALH <br /> Is <br /> Constituent Current Limit (mom Proposed Limit (mg/1) <br /> Cadmium 0.1 1.0 <br /> Chromium VI 0.5 5.0 <br /> Total Chromium 560 560 <br /> Lead 0.5 5.0 <br /> Mercury 0.02 0.2 <br /> Nickel 0.134 20 <br /> Zinc 0.2 250 <br /> Copper 20 25 <br /> Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 100 Same <br /> Benzene 0.7 Same <br /> In our opinion, the reclassification would be exempt from CEQA review because <br /> this is an ongoing project, and no new construction or environmental impacts would <br /> result from reclassification. We would like to know whether the County agrees with <br /> the proposed CEQA exemption. If the County disagrees or feels that a CEQA <br /> document is required for reclassification, please let us know. We would also like to <br /> know if the County will become the lead agency under CEQA for reclassification, if <br /> you decide reclassification is not exempt. <br /> If you have any questions, please call Steve Rosenbaum at (916) 361-5732. <br /> WILLIAM�J. MARSHALL, Chief <br /> Waste Discharge to Land Unit <br /> SER <br /> cc: Mr. Duane Gelster, Department of Toxic Substances Control, Cal-EPA, <br /> Sacramento <br /> Ms. Beatrice Cuenca, Integrated Waste Management Board, Sacramento <br /> Mr. John Loane, Integrated Waste Management Board, Sacramento <br /> Mr. Chandler Martin, Department of Planning and Building Inspection, San <br /> Joaquin County, Stockton <br />