Laserfiche WebLink
Showdown over S.J. landfill may co P *o a head I Recordnet.com Page 1 of 2 <br />SHOWDOWN OVER S.J. LANDFILL MAY COME TO A HEAD <br />SUPERVISORS TO WEIGH EXPANSION AMID CONCERNS OF AIRPORT SAFETY <br />By Alex Breitler <br />September 21, 2013 <br />Record Staff Writer <br />The summit of Forward Landfill is the highest point in central San Joaquin County, towering 210 feet above the <br />Valley floor. To the west, you can see for miles across farms and south Stockton until the view disappears in the <br />haze. <br />You don't have to look that far, however, to spot the airport. Just follow the descent of a small plane whose shadow <br />crosses a nearby field where Forward hopes to someday expand its operations. <br />Stockton Metropolitan Airport and the privately owned landfill have been close neighbors for many years, but the <br />proposed expansion has triggered a fierce land -use dispute expected to culminate Tuesday with a hearing before <br />the county Board of Supervisors. <br />The airport says fattening the landfill so that it extends beneath the airport's outer approach and within 6,000 feet <br />of the runway is inappropriate. Landfills attract birds, and birds and airplanes don't mix. <br />"The issue of expansion is it extends the life of the landfill and poses problems into the future," said Harry <br />Mavrogenes, the airport's interim director. <br />Forward says it can keep the birds away - that it in fact has already scared them off over the past couple of years <br />using menacing falcons and loud pyrotechnics. <br />"We've created a terror zone, versus a feeding zone. Those seagulls are gone," said Kevin Basso, general <br />manager of landfill owner Allied Waste, which merged with Arizona -based Republic Services Inc. in 2008 to form <br />the nation's second-largest waste hauler. <br />The dispute has produced reams of paperwork as consultants labor over environmental documents, opponents' <br />lawyers fire off lengthy comment letters and bird experts on each side argue over the feeding habits of seagulls. <br />Forward's foes claim many reasons to fight. Some worry about groundwater and air pollution, agriculture and food <br />safety, noise and smell. Some point to recent environmental violations at the landfill as evidence of a poor track <br />record. <br />And some don't like the fact that most of the garbage buried at Forward is imported from other counties, <br />considering San Joaquin County officials say there is room in county -owned landfills for another 30 years' worth of <br />local trash. <br />But the issue before the supervisors Tuesday is a narrow one - whether the airport and an ever -larger Forward <br />Landfill can coexist. <br />The county's Airport Land Use Commission has already determined the expansion is not consistent with a plan for <br />the airport developed in 1993. That means Forward's owners will have to convince four out of five county <br />supervisors on Tuesday that the expansion should not be blocked. <br />"If (Forward) can't get around this, it can't get any further. That would be a stopper," said Jeannie La Forge, who <br />lives in Colorado but owns property near the landfill and started a coalition in an effort to mobilize opposition. <br />http://www.recordnet.comlappslpbcs.dll/article?AID=1201309211A NEWS/309210318&cid=sitesearc... 9/23/2013 <br />