My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0015279
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
6550
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2200090 (GP)
>
SU0015279
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:48:21 PM
Creation date
11/23/2022 8:52:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0015279
PE
2691
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2200090 (GP)
STREET_NUMBER
6550
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
LODI
Zip
95240-
APN
04912004
ENTERED_DATE
11/23/2022 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
6550 E HWY 12
RECEIVED_DATE
11/22/2022 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Opposition <br /> The Community Development Department received six letters of opposition citing concerns regarding the <br /> project.These concerns included air quality,water quality and hydrology,traffic, noise, hazardous materials <br /> and chemicals, litter, light pollution, utilization of private services, and land use compatibility. <br /> Air Quality:As discussed previously, the project completed the AIA process, which resulted in mitigation <br /> measures related to project emissions. These measures are included in the project's Mitigation Monitoring <br /> and Reporting Program (Attachment E), and are also included in the project's recommended Conditions of <br /> Approval (Attachment G). With the inclusion of these mitigation measures, project impacts to air quality are <br /> anticipated to be less than significant. <br /> Water Quality and Hydrology: Concerns were raised regarding the process water discharge area <br /> potentially affecting ground water quality and ground water supply. The discharge area is planted in alfalfa, <br /> and the alfalfa acts as a natural filter for the process water. The applicant states that the discharge water is <br /> tested and must meet specific levels before the water can be dispersed into the discharge area as outlined <br /> in the previously discussed CVRWQCB Order. As a result, project impacts to water quality are anticipated <br /> to be less than significant. <br /> Regarding water usage, the project will be served by an existing on-site well. The proposed agricultural <br /> processing facility anticipates using approximately 15,000 gallons of water per day for 6 weeks for <br /> processing pears from July to September and 200 gallons of water per day for 6 weeks during holiday fruit <br /> packaging. The remaining 40 weeks of the year, the water usage is anticipated to be approximately 30 <br /> gallons per day. Any improvements to the well must be done under permit from the Environmental Health <br /> Department. Based on this information, project impacts related to hydrology are anticipated to be less than <br /> significant. <br /> Traffic:Traffic concerns included objections to the project using the East Pine Street access point and the <br /> use of Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA)trucks. The proposed driveway from Pine Street will <br /> require an encroachment permit and will be subject to the rules and regulations of the Department of Public <br /> Works. No access is proposed from State Route 12, nor is access from State Route 12 required. <br /> The project applicant states that STAA trucks will make deliveries to the site. As a result, the Department <br /> of Public Works will require the applicant to obtain approval from Public Works and CalTrans for new or <br /> extended STAA routes. Approved routes may include additional improvements at the discretion of these <br /> agencies. <br /> California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15064.3 requires Vehicle Miles Traveled <br /> (VMT) be evaluated as a part of the environmental review. The Community Development Department, in <br /> conjunction with the Department of Public Works, reviewed the VMT for the proposed project and has <br /> determined the project will generate less than 110 vehicle trips per day.Therefore,the project is considered <br /> a small project according to the Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, as <br /> published by the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) in December 2018. As a result, traffic <br /> impacts are anticipated to be less than significant with this application. <br /> Noise:Regarding noise, Development Title Section 9-404 lists the Residential use type as a noise sensitive <br /> land use. Development Title Section Table 9-404.050 states that the maximum sound level for stationary <br /> noise sources of 65dB is normally acceptable and does not require additional study. The nearest single- <br /> family residence is located approximately 600 feet southwest of the project site and packaging activities will <br /> occur indoors. Agricultural activities like fruit processing are covered under the Right-to-Farm ordinance, <br /> which states agricultural activities shall not be considered a nuisance. <br /> Additionally, noises from construction activities are exempt from noise standards provided the construction <br /> occurs no earlier than 6:00 A.M. and no later than 9:00 P.M. The proposed project would be subject to <br /> Development Title standards pertaining to maximum sound levels for stationary noise sources and <br /> construction activities. As a result noise impacts are anticipated to be less than significant with this <br /> application. <br /> Planning Commission Staff Report, PA-2200090, PA-2100295 (GP, SA) 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.