Laserfiche WebLink
accurately estimating the quantity of recharge waters is 2.8 <br /> clearly evident,particularly in cases of higher nitrogen load- <br /> ing and lower denitrification rates. nb='- 4aI/dey/awellinQ unfit <br /> N 2.0 b0 mp/L <br /> In Figure 2,the critical minimum gross acreage per lot, F <br /> A,is plotted against the annual rate of rainfall recharge,R, 0 , <br /> for a selected range of values for n,,and d, with nb= 1.0 0 ,.6 4£�0 <br /> mg/1 as before. In this instance the long-term waste-water , <br /> flow, W, is assumed equal to 150 gal/day per DU, on the = <br /> S <br /> ; 4 o c o <br /> basis of an average expected occupancy of three persons per a ,,G <br /> residence and 50 gal/person/day.The U.S.EPA(1980)cites m a < ao <br /> 45 gal/day as the typical per capita flow for residential m o� a o� <br /> dwellings.The influence of climate and the water balance is <br /> seen to be significant,particularly for lower ranges of R,i.e., o s <br /> drier climates.Thus,in desert areas,very large lots may be <br /> necessary. °0 5 10 16 20 26 30 <br /> In typical new developments of single family resi- NATURAL RAINFALL RECHARGE, R, In/yr <br /> dences, practical lot size limits exist because of minimum Fig.2.Influence of effluent quality,denitrification,and rainfall <br /> space requirements for site development, disposal fields, recharge on critical lot size. <br /> roadways,open space,etc.These limits may be on the order <br /> of 0.25 to 1.0 gross acres per dwelling unit, depending on <br /> local codes and specific development plans. As seen in <br /> Figure 2, such practical or statutory limits may often be <br /> more stringent than the critical minimum gross acreage per <br /> lot, A, determined from equation (2). This is particularly =_____==__=- 0 <br /> true as R values increase. <br /> __ --_ 7 I CHICO AREA <br /> Case Study Examples <br /> To demonstrate and test their validity, the preceding <br /> methods for assessing nitrate impacts were compared <br /> against the actual ground-water quality data for three <br /> LINAS <br /> California communities.All three of these communities rely BO <br /> =__O o <br /> on individual on-site systems for sewage disposal. In each <br /> case ground-water contamination by nitrates has been docu- <br /> mented by extensive monitoring programs.The three com- <br /> munities reviewed here as case study examples are: (l)the ==-= <br />