My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1984-1989
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1984-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2023 4:12:55 PM
Creation date
4/7/2023 1:44:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1984-1989
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
728
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MELJUMAILY & BUTLER ASSOCIATES <br /> DA Waste Management Consultants �rTAI HEp,LTH <br /> EN F ERNIII/SER'VICES <br /> July 12, 1988 <br /> Alan Beiderman <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> San Joaquin County Health District <br /> 1601 E. Nazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> Dear Alan: <br /> Enclosed are the results of the sampling event at the <br /> Forward landfill which took place in June of this year. As <br /> you can see, most of the wells have been found to contain <br /> no contamination above drinking water standards. <br /> Two wells, however, do show anomalous concentrations of <br /> contaminates which constitute violations. The sampling of <br /> MW-4 found there to be Beene present while MW-5 detected <br /> a number of items, several of which are above acceptable <br /> standards. The source of the pollution in MW-5 may be <br /> attributed to contaminated water percolating vertically <br /> downward from the adjacent stream or, in the case of both <br /> wells, a migration of contaminates from the once active <br /> surface impoundments. The only other detected <br /> contaminate is coliform which was found in four of the <br /> wells. <br /> The laboratory doing the analysis work, Multi-Tech Labs, <br /> exceeded the holding time of the 601/602 for MW-5, which in <br /> itself is reason to resample the well. Also, they verbally <br /> indicated that there were some unidentified peaks on the <br /> run, however, did not retest the sample for 624 because the <br /> holding time had already passed. <br /> EBA proposes to resample MW-5 for the entire set of <br /> parameters previously tested, that is, all the parameters <br /> seen on the attached sheets, along with EPA 624 . We will <br /> also test MW-4 for purgeable aromatics (602) , MW-8 for <br /> metals and wells MW-7, MW-9, MW-10 for fecal coliform. In <br /> addition to these wells, we propose to sample South Little <br /> Johns Creek at a location adjacent to MW-5 and also at the <br /> west property line, testing for purgeable aromatics (602) <br /> and metals. <br /> 825 Sonoma Ave., Suite C Post Office Box 4600 Santa Rosa, California 95402 (707) 544-0784 FAX (707) 544-0866 <br /> Also Auburn, California and Las Vegas, Nevada <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.