Laserfiche WebLink
The laboratory analytical results for soil samples SSA-1', SSB-1' and SSC-1' are tabulated in Tables 1 and <br />3. The laboratory analytical report and chain-of-custody documentation is provided in Appendix F. <br />SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD ENVIRONMENTAL <br />SCREENING LEVELS <br />Laboratory analytical results for soil samples collected as part of this investigation were compared to the <br />July 2019 (Revision 2) SFBRWQCB Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs). The ESLs are considered to be <br />conservative and under most circumstances and within the limitations described in the ESL guidance <br />document, the presence of a chemical at concentrations below the corresponding ESL can generally be <br />assumed to not pose a significant threat to human health or the environment. Conversely, an exceedance <br />of an applicable ESL does not necessarily indicate that a potential ecological or human health risk exists <br />or that mitigation or remediation to levels below applicable ESLs would otherwise be required. However, <br />an exceedance of an ESL may warrant further attention or consideration in light of the anticipated land <br />use, receptors (e.g., ecological or human), and/or potential routes of exposure. <br />Arsenic was consistently detected in all soil samples collected as part of this assessment at concentrations <br />in excess of the Commercial/Industrial ESLs. However, arsenic occurs naturally in California soils at <br />concentrations in excess of the SFBRWQCB health-based ESLs. Therefore, soil data are typically compared <br />to background concentrations for naturally-occurring elements. Background concentrations of arsenic in <br />the State of California generally range up to approximately 11 mg/kg (3) therefore . No other exceedances <br />of the SFBRWQCB ESLS were noted for any other metals in any soil samples collected as part of this <br />assessment. <br />Laboratory analytical results of soil samples collected during this investigation indicated the <br />presence of trace concentrations of TPH-g, TPH-d, TPH-mo and TPH-rr and VOCs in soil samples collected <br />as part of this assessment (with the exception of arsenic). However, no VOCs or TPH fractions were <br />detected at concentrations in excess of the SFBRWQCB ESLs for Residential or Commercial/Industrial land <br />uses. Therefore, the presence of trace concentrations of these constituents does not represent an <br />environmental condition in relation to the formerly buried Jeep at the Bonnie Plants facility. <br />3 Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Background Concentrations of Metals, a Progress Report <br />(undated). <br />ADDITIONAL CORRECTIVE ACTIONS <br />Pallets of Nutricote Total Type 140, Peters Excel 15-5-15 in Greenhouse 3D and Pallets <br />of Nature Safe 10-2-8 in Greenhouse 3D <br />During their walkthrough at the Bonnie Plants facility, SJCEHD personnel observed five-and-a-half pallets <br />of Nutricote Total 18-6-8 Type 140 fertilizer, one pallet of Peters Excel 15-5-15 fertilizer and 13 pallets of <br />Nature Safe 10-2-8 in greenhouses at the Bonnie Plants facility. Additionally, two pallets of Nature Safe <br />10-2-8 observed in Greenhouse 3 D had holes in bags where the contents had leaked onto the floor. The <br />Notice to Abate indicated storage of these materials requires secondary containment. Atlas personnel <br />worked with Bonnie Plants personnel to provide secondary containment for the dry fertilizer storage areas <br />at the Bonnie Pants facility. Pictures of the secondary containment for the dry fertilizer storage locations <br />that were taken on March 22, 2022, are provided in Appendix E.