My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0015801
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PATTERSON PASS
>
20042
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2200137
>
SU0015801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2024 1:55:05 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 1:18:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0015801
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2200137
STREET_NUMBER
20042
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
PATTERSON PASS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377-
APN
20910019, 99B-7885-002, 99B-7590-1-3
ENTERED_DATE
8/29/2023 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20042 W PATTERSON PASS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/14/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
987
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 Environmental Analysis <br /> 4.1 Aesthetics <br /> 4.1.5 Impact Analysis <br /> IMPACT 4.1-1: Would the project have substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (Less than <br /> Significant Impact) <br /> Views of the Diablo Range from 1-580 and views of lands under agricultural production while <br /> driving on two-lane roads through rural portions of the county are identified as scenic vistas (San <br /> Joaquin County 2014). The Project would be barely visible, if at all, from 1-580, and would not <br /> block views for the Diablo Range from 1-580. No impacts to views of the Diablo Range from 1-580 <br /> are expected. <br /> The Project site is rural in character with a wide variety of visual encroachments, including <br /> scattered ranch structures, agricultural buildings and infrastructure, fencing, local electrical <br /> distribution lines and high-voltage transmission lines, and roadways. The Project would add <br /> energy storage facilities and infrastructure and reduce the amount of land under agricultural <br /> production. The Project facilities would have a consistent visual character with the existing local <br /> electrical distribution lines, high-voltage transmission lines, and the nearby Tesla Substation. Due <br /> to the surrounding terrain, views of the Project from Patterson Pass Road and Midway Road <br /> would be limited to a short distance. Due to the terrain and distance, there are no views of the <br /> Project from the Top of World Scenic Lookout. In addition, the Project will be separated from the <br /> roadways by lands under agricultural production. Therefore, the impacts are expected to be less <br /> than significant. <br /> Mitigation: None required. <br /> M PACT 4.1-2: Would the project substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited <br /> to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (No Impact) <br /> Corral Hollow Road, located 5 miles to the south of the Project site, is identified as a local scenic <br /> road (San Joaquin County 2014). Due to terrain and distance, the Project site is not visible from <br /> this roadway; therefore, no impact to this scenic roadway will occur. <br /> The officially designated state scenic highway segment of 1-580 is located 1 mile to the northeast <br /> of the Project site. The eligible state scenic highway segment of 1-580 is located approximately <br /> 2.2 miles to the north of the Project site (Caltrans 2022). Due to terrain and structures, the Project <br /> is either not visible or barely visible (see Figures 4.1-1 and 4.1-8). The Project will not involve <br /> substantial damage to scenic resources, such as trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings. <br /> The Project facilities would appear as a continuation of the existing electrical distribution <br /> infrastructure. Based on general lack of visibility of the Project site, no significant impacts to a <br /> scenic highway are expected. <br /> Mitigation: None required. <br /> IMPACT 4.1-3: In non-urbanized area, would the project substantially degrade the existing visual <br /> character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that <br /> are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, <br /> would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations of governing scenic quality? <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project 4.1-23 Tetra Tech/SCH 2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.