Laserfiche WebLink
4 Environmental Analysis <br /> 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources <br /> Importance. As such, conversion of the Project site for battery energy storage is not a significant <br /> adverse impact on agricultural resources. This conclusion is buttressed by a LESA model, a tool <br /> recommended to be used by lead agencies in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines to determine <br /> the significance of the conversion of agricultural land. In this case, the Project-specific LESA <br /> prepared for this Project concludes that "the Project will not have a significant impact on <br /> agricultural land use within the Project area or Zone of Influence" (Appendix B). Therefore, no <br /> impact would occur, and no mitigation would be required because there is no evidence that the <br /> Project would result in a significant impact due to conversion of unirrigated, Grazing Land, <br /> Farmland of Local Importance, Other Land, or Urban Built-up Land to a renewable energy use. <br /> Mitigation: None required. <br /> IMPACT 4.2-2: Would the project conflict with existing zoning foragricultural use, ora Williamson <br /> Act contract? (Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated) <br /> As discussed above in Section 4.2.1, Existing Conditions, the battery energy storage portion of <br /> the Project site located in San Joaquin County is zoned Agricultural General-160. According to <br /> Division 14, Section 9-605.2, of the San Joaquin County Municipal Ordinance Code, any Major <br /> Utility use, including such things as transmission lines, substations, wind farms and related <br /> facilities, such as a BESS, as described County Code Division 6, Section 9-605.2, is permitted on <br /> Agricultural General zoned land through a Site Approval application. Prior to approving an <br /> application for a Site Approval, the Review Authority shall make findings pursuant to Section 9- <br /> 818.6 of the San Joaquin County Code. Accordingly, the Project would not conflict with the <br /> existing zoning for agricultural use in San Joaquin County. <br /> Further, the gen-tie line portion of the Project site, located in Alameda County, is zoned <br /> Agricultural (A). Public utility uses, excepting buildings and service yards or storage yards, are <br /> permitted in any zoning district pursuant to Section 17.52.020 of the Alameda County Municipal <br /> Code. Therefore, the gen-tie line portion of the Project, and specifically the portion of the gen-tie <br /> line to be constructed by the Applicant from the battery energy storage facility to the point of <br /> change of ownership (POCO or tie-in), would not conflict with the existing zoning for agricultural <br /> use in Alameda County. The portion of the gen-tie line from the POCO to the PG&E Tesla <br /> Substation would be constructed by PG&E and is discussed in Section 4.2.6 below. However, <br /> this portion of the gen-tie line would similarly not conflict with the existing zoning. <br /> The San Joaquin County portion of the Project site is included in a Williamson Act contract. The <br /> Applicant, in partnership with the property owners, has filed a Petition for Cancellation of Contract <br /> for the Williamson Act contract, seeking a finding from the San Joaquin County Board of <br /> Supervisors that cancellation is either consistent with the purposes of the act or is in the public <br /> interest (see Government Code § 51282(a) through (c). The Alameda County portion of the <br /> Project site is not included in a Williamson Act contract. <br /> Petitions for cancellation of the contracts were submitted to the County pursuant to Government <br /> Code § 51282(a)(1), seeking cancellation under the "public interest' cancellation provisions <br /> (Government Code § 51282(a)). To determine that the cancellation is in the public interest, the <br /> County must find (1) that other public concerns substantially outweigh the objectives of the <br /> Williamson Act, and (2) that there is no proximate noncontracted land that is both available and <br /> suitable for the proposed use or that development of the contracted land would provide more <br /> contiguous patterns of urban development (Government Code § 51282(c)). <br /> Griffith Battery Energy Storage Project 4.2-10 Tetra Tech/SCH 2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />