My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0015801
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PATTERSON PASS
>
20042
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2200137
>
SU0015801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2024 1:55:05 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 1:18:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0015801
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2200137
STREET_NUMBER
20042
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
PATTERSON PASS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377-
APN
20910019, 99B-7885-002, 99B-7590-1-3
ENTERED_DATE
8/29/2023 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20042 W PATTERSON PASS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/14/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
987
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 Environmental Analysis <br /> 4.4 Biological Resources <br /> portion in Alameda County would be permitted separately through coordination with the USFWS <br /> and CDFW. The mitigation measures presented in Section 4.4.5 are drawn from the SJMSCP. <br /> These are comparatively protective as the measures included in the East Alameda Conservation <br /> Strategy, described below, and would allow measures be consistently implemented on the <br /> ground, during construction. Having different measures apply in San Joaquin County than in <br /> Alameda County would be unnecessarily difficult to implement, likely resulting in lower quality <br /> protection for the resources. <br /> The SJMSCP (SJCOG 2000) satisfies the requirements of the federal and state ESAs, and <br /> provides measures to mitigate impacts on special-status species and their habitat to a less than <br /> significant level in compliance with CEQA. This plan has been finalized. Projects with anticipated <br /> impacts to special-status species are eligible for incidental take coverage under the SJMSCP and <br /> would not require separate incidental take permits or consultations for SJMSCP Covered Species. <br /> The SJMSCP provides incidental take coverage for 97 listed and non-listed plants, fish, and <br /> wildlife, and provides compensation for habitat losses through collection of fees. Species with <br /> potential to occur on-site that are covered by the SJMSCP include CTS, western spadefoot, <br /> CRLF, San Joaquin coachwhip, BUOW, Swainson's hawk and other nesting birds, SJKF, <br /> American badger, and special-status vernal pool invertebrates. As described below in Section <br /> 4.4.5, Mitigation Measures, the SJMSCP would be used to mitigate potential impacts to these <br /> special-status species and their habitats. Participation of the Project in the SJMSCP will reduce <br /> impacts to covered species and habitats to a less than significant level under CEQA. Conversion <br /> of natural lands (e.g., agricultural rangelands), like those on the area to be developed, has a <br /> current per-acre fee of$19,561 to provide compensation for habitat losses (SJCOG 2022). <br /> 4.4.2.9 East Alameda County Conservation Strategy <br /> The proposed gen-tie line is partially in Alameda County and is within the planning area for the <br /> East Alameda County Conservation Strategy (EACCS; ICF International 2010). The EACCS is a <br /> regional conservation strategy that provides guidelines and recommended avoidance, <br /> minimization, and mitigation measures for impacts on selected focal special-status species and <br /> sensitive habitats. The resources agencies have participated in development of the EACCS, but <br /> it does not provide incidental take permits for special-status species, as is the case in an HCP, <br /> but rather serves as guidance for project-level permits. Therefore, work within Alameda County <br /> would still require project-level incidental take permits for impacts to special-status species. To <br /> retain consistency across all aspects of the project the mitigation measures presented in Section <br /> 4.4.5 are consistent with the SJMSCP. These vary slightly from those included in the EACCS; <br /> however, they are equally or greater protective. While use of the EACCS general and species <br /> avoidance and minimization measures are required if seeking coverage for a project under the <br /> Programmatic Biological Opinion between the Corps and the USFWS, they are only <br /> recommendations if pursuing and individual incidental take permit. In order to provide a consistent <br /> approach across the entire project mitigation measures consistent with the SJMSCP were <br /> included instead of measures from EACCS. In some instances, when a species was not <br /> addressed in the SJMSCP (i.e., big tarplant) the EACCS measures were employed. <br /> Methodology <br /> The following summarizes the literature and field survey methods used for evaluating biological <br /> resources. <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project 4.4-27 Tetra Tech/SCH 2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.