My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0015801
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PATTERSON PASS
>
20042
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2200137
>
SU0015801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2024 1:55:05 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 1:18:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0015801
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2200137
STREET_NUMBER
20042
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
PATTERSON PASS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377-
APN
20910019, 99B-7885-002, 99B-7590-1-3
ENTERED_DATE
8/29/2023 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20042 W PATTERSON PASS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/14/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
987
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 Environmental Analysis <br /> 4.4 Biological Resources <br /> 4.4.6 Pacific Gas and Electric Tesla Substation Improvements <br /> To accommodate the Project, PG&E would construct network upgrades, interconnection facilities, <br /> and an interconnection gen-tie line that would extend from the battery storage facility to the <br /> available PG&E Tesla Substation bay. Two options are available for the gen-tie line route and, <br /> therefore, evaluated in this document (Figure 4.4-1). The first option would be to connect via an <br /> aboveground line on the west side of the southwestern boundary of the substation. The second <br /> option would be to enter the substation on the southwestern edge by way of a belowground line. <br /> The belowground line would enter the substation somewhere between the western edge and the <br /> center of the south boundary of the substation. The gen-tie line would not include lighting, so <br /> potential lighting impacts to wildlife would not occur. <br /> Additionally, PG&E would upgrade the Tesla Substation, and the improvements would include <br /> the installation of a grounding system, disconnect switches, surge arresters, outdoor lighting and <br /> outlets, and fiber termination for the gen-tie line. The improvements made would be within the <br /> existing Tesla Substation footprint. Construction during the upgrades at the Tesla Substation, <br /> including noise, vehicle traffic, temporary lighting during limited nighttime activities, and on-site <br /> personnel, has the potential to affect BUOW, SJKF, and American badger if present in or near the <br /> construction area. These impacts would be similar to the impacts analyzed above for construction <br /> and operation of the BESS and support infrastructure. With implementation of Mitigation <br /> Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2, including a preconstruction survey and a measure to minimize <br /> lighting impacts, construction impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. <br /> Potential direct impacts, such as injury or mortality, to raptor species and special-status migratory <br /> birds from Project O&M may occur through the collisions into and/or electrocution from <br /> transmission lines or structures to be installed as part of the gen-tie line. Raptors and migratory <br /> birds may use utility structures for perching while hunting. While collision/electrocution impacts to <br /> raptors and special-status migratory birds are potentially significant, impacts would be reduced <br /> through the implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-2, which requires power lines to be <br /> installed per the most recent APLIC guidance (APLIC 2012) to reduce the potential for bird injury <br /> and mortality from collisions and electrocution. <br /> Through the implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1, BIO-2, and BIO-3, these <br /> improvements would not have a substantial adverse effect on any listed, candidate, sensitive, or <br /> special-status species that is protected under any local or regional plans, polices, or regulations. <br /> These improvements would also not have an adverse effect on any riparian habitat or sensitive <br /> natural communities identified in any local or regional plan, policies, or regulations, or on protected <br /> wetlands. No resident or migratory wildlife species, established wildlife corridors, or wildlife <br /> nursery sites would be affected by the PG&E improvements. In addition, these improvements <br /> would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources with the <br /> implementation of Mitigation Measures 13I0-1, BIO-2, and BIO-3. Therefore, no additional <br /> mitigation measures would be required. <br /> 4.4.7 Cumulative Impacts <br /> Cumulative effects of multiple projects are caused by the incremental impact of a proposed project <br /> in combination with the impacts of other closely related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable <br /> probable future projects. The ongoing impacts of past projects are reflected in the existing <br /> environmental setting. In this context, the cumulative effects of the Project in combination with the <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project 4.4-50 Tetra Tech/SCH 2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.