Laserfiche WebLink
4 Environmental Analysis <br /> 4.7 Geology, Soils, and Paleontological Resources <br /> fossils could be discovered up to 10 feet, the implementation of mitigation for unanticipated fossil <br /> discovery would reduce the potential significance of any unanticipated fossil discoveries to a less- <br /> than-significant level. <br /> Through the implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-3, these <br /> improvements would not have a substantial adverse effect on any geology, soils, or <br /> paleontological resources, and no additional mitigation measures would be required. <br /> 4.7.7 Cumulative Impacts <br /> Impacts related to geology, soils, and seismicity tend to be site-specific and depend on the local <br /> geology and soil conditions. For these reasons, the geographic scope for potential cumulative <br /> impacts consists of the Project site and adjacent areas. One cumulative project, as identified in <br /> Table 2-3 in Chapter 2, Project Description, is adjacent to the Project. Additionally, the Project <br /> would be designed and constructed in accordance with the most current building code <br /> requirements, and the potential for the Project to exacerbate seismic hazards would be less than <br /> significant. State and local building regulations and standards have been established to address <br /> and reduce the potential for projects to cause or exacerbate seismic hazard impacts. All projects <br /> would be required to comply with applicable provisions of these laws and regulations. Compliance <br /> with these requirements would limit the potential for impacts to a less than significant level. The <br /> purpose of the CBC (and related local ordinances) is to regulate and control the design, <br /> construction, quality of materials, use or occupancy, location, and maintenance of all buildings <br /> and structures within its jurisdiction. Based on compliance with these requirements, the <br /> incremental impacts of the Project combined with impacts of other projects in the area would not <br /> combine to cause a significant cumulative impact related to seismic hazards. <br /> Other individual projects and this Project are required to comply with existing codes, standards, <br /> and permitting requirements (e.g., preparation of a SWPPP under the state Construction General <br /> Permit) to reduce erosion impacts. Potential Project-related impacts to soil erosion and loss of <br /> topsoil would be reduced through the implementation of the BMPs identified in the SWPPP, as <br /> required by Mitigation Measure GEO-1. Requirements in the state Construction General Permit <br /> are designed to reduce adverse cumulative effects of construction-phase erosion. Individual <br /> projects' compliance with stormwater control requirements would reduce the overall cumulative <br /> impact to a less-than-significant level. <br /> The aerial extent of cumulative impacts to paleontological resources includes the Project site and <br /> adjacent areas where Pleistocene-age deposits could be disturbed. If there were paleontological <br /> resources that extended across areas of ground disturbance of the proposed Project and <br /> cumulative projects, the projects could result in the loss of paleontological resources, a potentially <br /> significant impact. However, with implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-2 and GEO-3, <br /> the proposed Project would have a less-than-significant impact relating to the potential loss of <br /> paleontological resources in the event of inadvertent discovery during construction. This less- <br /> than-significant impact would not be cumulatively considerable because work would be halted <br /> immediately in the event of a find, thereby minimizing the potential impact. <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project 4.7-23 Tetra Tech/SCH 2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />