Laserfiche WebLink
4 Environmental Analysis <br /> 4.17 Utilities and Service Systems <br /> outlets, and fiber termination for the gen-tie line. The improvements made would be within the <br /> existing Tesla Substation footprint. <br /> The construction activities associated with the PG&E infrastructure would be required to comply <br /> with and adhere to the same design criteria included in the CBC as the rest of the Project <br /> components. Construction would be required to comply with requirements of the Construction <br /> General Permit as required by Mitigation Measure GEO-1, similar to the Project components <br /> evaluated above, including implementation of BMPs during construction activities. Subsurface <br /> excavation required for the PG&E infrastructure is not anticipated to occur at depths below 10 <br /> feet below ground surface. These improvements would not alter the current and future water <br /> usage of the Project. The utilities discussed in IMPACT 4.17-1 would not be affected due to the <br /> PG&E improvements, nor would solid waste management exceed any capacity of the local waste <br /> facilities or the standards set by local and state agencies as a result of these impacts. Additionally, <br /> the PG&E improvements would not obstruct the implementation of the Basin Plan or the Tracy <br /> Subbasin GSP. Thus, the improvements would have no impact on local utilities. <br /> 4.17.6 Cumulative Impacts <br /> The potential cumulative impacts related to utilities and service systems would extend within the <br /> service areas of the utility and service providers that would serve the Project site. As discussed <br /> above, there would be less than significant impacts with respect to construction or expansion of <br /> water, wastewater, stormwater, telecommunications, or natural gas facilities, or compliance with <br /> federal, state, or local management and reduction statutes related to solid waste, such that there is <br /> no significant cumulative impact to these criteria to which the Project could contribute. <br /> The cumulative analysis provided below considers the incremental impacts related to water <br /> availability and landfill capacity that could be caused by the Project in combination with other past, <br /> present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. <br /> The geographic scope of potential cumulative impacts to landfill capacity would be the areas served <br /> by the Foothill Sanitary Landfill and the North County Recycling Center and Sanitary Landfill. <br /> The Foothill Sanitary Landfill currently has a permitted capacity of 1,500 tons of solid waste per <br /> day and a total design capacity of 138,000,000 cubic yards; the landfill has an estimated "cease <br /> of operation date" of December 31, 2082 (CalRecycle 2022a; San Joaquin County 2022). The <br /> North County Recycling Center and Sanitary Landfill has a permitted capacity of 825 tons of <br /> solid waste per day and a total design capacity of 41,200,000 cubic yards with an estimated <br /> "cease of operation date" of December 31, 2048 (CalRecycle 2022b). <br /> The Project would generate solid waste, causing less than significant impacts during short-term <br /> construction and decommissioning and a negligible amount during operations and maintenance, <br /> recycling whenever feasible. In the unlikely scenario that the cumulative projects resulted in a <br /> significant cumulative effect, the Project's incremental contribution would not be cumulatively <br /> considerable due to the negligible amount of waste that would be generated during the Project's <br /> lifecycle. <br /> The WSA determined water availability during normal, single dry, and multiple dry years during a <br /> 20-year projection in addition to the area's existing and planned future uses. Any adjacent <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project 4.17-14 Tetra Tech/SCH 2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />