My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0015801
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PATTERSON PASS
>
20042
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2200137
>
SU0015801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2024 1:55:05 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 1:18:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0015801
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2200137
STREET_NUMBER
20042
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
PATTERSON PASS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377-
APN
20910019, 99B-7885-002, 99B-7590-1-3
ENTERED_DATE
8/29/2023 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20042 W PATTERSON PASS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/14/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
987
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 Environmental Analysis <br /> 4.18 Wildfire <br /> 4.18.3 Thresholds of Significance <br /> A project would result in significant wildfire impacts if located in or near state responsibility areas <br /> or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, and would: <br /> a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan; <br /> b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, would exacerbate wildfire risks, and <br /> thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the <br /> uncontrolled spread of wildfire; <br /> c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel <br /> breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire <br /> risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment; or <br /> d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream <br /> flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? <br /> 4.18.4 Impact Analysis <br /> IMPACT 4.18-1: Would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or <br /> emergency evacuation plan? (No Impact) <br /> The Project is entirely located within a High FHSZ within the SRA and the nearest Very High <br /> FHSZ is located approximately 3.5 miles southwest of the Project site (Figure 4.18-1). The primary <br /> fire protection services in the vicinity of the Project site are provided by SJC Fire. However, CAL <br /> FIRE is responsible for providing wildland fire protection, fire prevention, and resource <br /> management within SRA lands throughout California. The ACFD would also provide fire services <br /> to the portion of the gen-tie corridor in Alameda County and the PG&E Tesla Substation. <br /> The Project would comply with all applicable CAL FIRE and San Joaquin County Fire Protection <br /> District requirements, including those regarding site access. The Project would also incorporate <br /> fire protection measures in accordance with the requirements set forth by the County through the <br /> Site Approval application process. <br /> As discussed in Sections 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and 4.15, Transportation, the <br /> Project would not have an impact on emergency response, evacuation routes, and emergency <br /> access during construction, operation, and decommissioning. Due to the Project's location in a <br /> rural area of San Joaquin County and the gen-tie line's location in rural Alameda County, the <br /> Project site is not located near any established evacuation routes and would not require any road <br /> closures during any Project phase (San Joaquin County 2022d). Further, the Project would not <br /> result in population growth in the area, which could strain emergency evacuation efforts. <br /> Construction and decommissioning would also be temporary and short-term in nature, and <br /> construction of the Project would require approximately 60 workers at peak, with average number <br /> of workers on-site anticipated to be approximately 10 to 60 people. Decommissioning of the <br /> Project would require a similar workforce. During Project operation, one or two workers would visit <br /> the site on a weekly basis. Thus, due to the rural location of the Project and the minimal personnel <br /> required for all Project phases, the Project would result in no impact with regard to the substantial <br /> impairment of an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. <br /> Mitigation: None required. <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project 4.18-13 Tetra Tech/SCH 2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.