Laserfiche WebLink
5 Comparison of Comparison of Alternatives <br /> 6rMlth EmM-LLIC <br /> GriCdh E, rW Projaat <br /> F <br /> Figure 6,2 <br /> t - HoAhlrn Sale AROmEtrve <br /> /lenxa`a,U irr.Jo-ra..r Ca-i*A CA <br /> Mrpjmt PoWu6 <br /> O,Af Lh Ei W W 9447wo <br /> ! { Q 060MhErwov D4 ue <br /> { - P�Kwi,K B4wwL:7 <br /> y <br /> Na vwrn Slloh kcnmF <br /> Bao-naarY <br /> Two Sub3bca <br /> • eoyrrdmiief <br /> Op IN�FIOHOJ� <br /> FFa ww <br /> 1. <br /> * pr <br /> YGr rw GGiGIlVG"Ny <br /> liefe.enae r.bu <br /> r_IC,01}i F{�Drt94381tt44�FPFC41�tom441pFIF8010]F4 x4 IAx LM <br /> Mr— ' <br /> Figure 5-2. Northern Site Alternative <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project 5-3 Tetra Tech/SCH 2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />