My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0015801
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PATTERSON PASS
>
20042
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2200137
>
SU0015801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2024 1:55:05 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 1:18:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0015801
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2200137
STREET_NUMBER
20042
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
PATTERSON PASS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377-
APN
20910019, 99B-7885-002, 99B-7590-1-3
ENTERED_DATE
8/29/2023 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20042 W PATTERSON PASS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/14/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
987
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report Griffith Energy Storage Project <br /> 1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE <br /> Tetra Tech has prepared an air quality analysis report to evaluate potential air quality and GHG impacts <br /> associated with the proposed energy storage Project. This analysis was prepared in accordance with the <br /> SJVAPCD Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts(SJCAPCD 2015a). This report has <br /> been prepared to support an environmental review with San Joaquin County as lead CEQA agency for <br /> the Project. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the SJVAPCD's methods, standards, and <br /> significance thresholds used in this analysis are considered appropriate for determining whether impacts <br /> require mitigation measures to be implemented. A segment of the gen-tie line (less than 0.25 miles) is <br /> located in Alameda County. This segment of the gen-tie line will also be compared to the SJVAPCD's <br /> significance thresholds as these are more stringent than the BAAQMD's significance thresholds, with the <br /> exception of PM2.5. The BAAQMD construction significance threshold of 10 tons per year will be used for <br /> PM2.a. <br /> Air quality impacts from grading and construction sources were analyzed based on the equipment used, <br /> length of time for a specific construction task, equipment power type (gasoline or diesel engine), <br /> equipment emission factors, horsepower, load factor, and percentage of time in use. Exhaust and dust <br /> emissions from worker commutes and travel were calculated based on available information regarding <br /> these activities. Fugitive dust(particulate matter less than 10 microns [PM,o] and PM2.5)emissions would <br /> result from wind erosion of exposed soil and soil storage piles, grading operations, and vehicles traveling <br /> on paved and unpaved roads. These emissions were calculated based on U.S. Environmental Protection <br /> Agency (EPA; AP-42 handbooks) emissions factors contained in the California Emissions Estimator <br /> Model (CaIEEMod; CAPCOA 2021) and construction information available and provided to Tetra Tech. <br /> Motor vehicle pollutant emissions associated with the Project operation were estimated for future <br /> conditions, utilizing information on facility operations. CaIEEMod was used to calculate the emissions <br /> associated with on-site construction activities and off-site vehicle trips to and from the Project site. <br /> Emissions associated with operations and maintenance of the facility were also quantified using <br /> CaIEEMod. The total Project construction and operational emissions were compared to the SJVAPCD <br /> threshold criteria, and a determination of significance was made. <br /> A discussion of GHGs and their potential effects on global climate change is included. Emissions of <br /> carbon dioxide (CO2), a key GHG identified in Assembly Bill (AB) 32, and other major GHGs such as <br /> methane (CH4)and nitrous oxide (N20)from direct and indirect Project-related sources were calculated. <br /> Tetra Tech calculated the construction related GHG emissions commensurate with available Project <br /> specific information. Standard measures for construction activities recommended by the SJVAPCD were <br /> identified and incorporated as part of the Project's standard conditions. Potential GHG impacts and <br /> benefits associated with the proposed energy storage Project were calculated. <br /> 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br /> The Project consists of constructing and operating a 400-MW Energy Storage Project to provide reliable <br /> and flexible power to the local electrical system. The Project would contain pad-mounted energy storage <br /> units, in addition to inverters, supervisory control and data acquisition equipment, a collector substation, <br /> and an interconnection gen-tie line to the Tesla Substation. The Project would also include related and <br /> supporting facilities such as on-site service roads, gates and security fencing, and temporary laydown <br /> and construction areas. Each enclosure would be equipped with heating, ventilation, and air conditioning <br /> systems for thermal management of the batteries. The power for the heating, ventilation, and air <br /> OTETRA TECH 3 July 2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.