Laserfiche WebLink
4 Environmental Analysis <br /> 4.1 Aesthetics <br /> 4.1.1.3 Key Observation Points <br /> Based on the ZVI and the identification of publicly accessible routes and viewpoints, potential KOPs <br /> were identified and further assessed during the field assessment. KOPs were identified based on <br /> locations from which the Project infrastructure would potentially be visible and noticeable to the casual <br /> observer. The "casual observer" is considered an observer who is not actively looking or searching for <br /> the Project, but who is engaged in activities at locations with potential views of the Project,such as hiking <br /> or driving along a scenic road. If the Project infrastructure is not noticeable to the casual observer,visual <br /> impacts can be considered minor to negligible. <br /> Six KOPs were selected as representative vantage points in the landscape that offer motorists traveling <br /> on area roadways and local residents views of the proposed Project site (Figure 4.1-2). These KOPs <br /> provide views from the closest roadways to the Project site from publicly accessible areas. <br /> Factors considered in the selection of KOPs included locations with sensitive viewers (e.g., local <br /> residences and motorists on nearby roadways)and potential for the Project site to be visible (e.g., <br /> distance and view angle). The KOPs were selected to capture representative vantages from 1-580, <br /> local roadways, and residences. <br /> Digital photographs were taken from the selected KOP locations to support the discussion on <br /> existing visual setting and the analysis of potential visual impacts associated with the proposed <br /> Project site (Figures 4.1-3 through 4.1-8). Photographs of existing conditions were taken on May <br /> 24, 2022, using a digital single-lens reflex Canon 5D Mark III camera. <br /> 4.1.1.4 Visual Simulations <br /> Three-dimensional (3D) visual simulations from representative KOP photographs were rendered <br /> to approximate the visual conditions caused by Project implementation. Using the photographs <br /> acquired at each KOP, a 3D physical massing model was created that incorporated the <br /> photovoltaic (PV) scale model, placed in array configurations as shown in Figure 2-2. The model <br /> was then georeferenced and placed on global positioning system (GPS)-controlled, site-specific <br /> photographs to create simulations that demonstrate visual changes from the Project. Figures <br /> 4.1-3 through 4.1-8 present simulated views of Project features. <br /> 4.1.1.5 Viewer Types and Characteristics <br /> The term "sensitive viewers" refers to specific user groups associated with various land uses that <br /> have a sensitivity to landscape change and, therefore, could be adversely affected by the <br /> construction and operation of a project. In this regard, potentially sensitive viewing locations are <br /> typically associated with key travel routes, recreation areas, and residential areas. Viewpoints <br /> represent critical or typical viewpoints within or along an identified viewing location and are used <br /> to assess visual impacts of a proposed project. The sensitivity of viewers at each viewpoint is <br /> based on the type of use, expected concern for aesthetics, and special status or designation. <br /> Identifying groups of individuals who would likely be sensitive to visual changes is an important <br /> part of the visual assessment process and helps to define specific locations from which to assess <br /> changes to the visual character of the landscape. An inventory of sensitive viewers considers <br /> 1) the most critical viewpoints (i.e., views from communities, residential areas, or recreational <br /> areas); 2)views from scenic areas specifically identified in local planning documents; and 3)views <br /> that represent the general area or landscape setting. <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project 4.1-7 Tetra Tech/SCH 2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />