Laserfiche WebLink
5) Eadler,analyses. `ay be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR,-or other QEQA process, an <br /> effect JTas, be6rs. adeqba1ely anitlyzed " in an earlier EIR 'or negative declaration. Section <br /> 15063(b)(3)(D). in this case, a brief disc*usMon should identify the following: <br /> a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review: <br /> b) Impacts Adequately Addressed'. -Identify which effects from the above checklist were within <br /> the scope of and'adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal <br /> standardg, and state whethbr such effects were'addressed by mitigation measures based on <br /> the earlie"r"analysis. <br /> Mifigati6k.M'easLifes. For'effects'that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures <br /> incorporated," de'scribe-the* mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the <br /> earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. <br /> 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for <br /> potential impacti`*(e.g. g6geral plans, .zoning <br /> z .,..ing ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or <br /> odtsid6 document should*, 'where a :* o <br /> pproptiate, include a reference to the page or poges where the <br /> statement is substantiated., <br /> 7) Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached, and other,sources used or <br /> individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. <br /> 8) This ie.only a ;34�ggested:form, ani! lead are free to use different formats; however, lead <br /> agencies shouldinormally.-addressthe:questions from this 'checklist that are relevant to a projects <br /> enviropmental efilkts in whatever f8rmat is.selected. <br /> The explanatiori..of each Issue shoutcl identify: <br /> a), the,signitioance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; arid <br /> b) the mitigation measure identifiedi1f any,to reduce the impact to less than significance. <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially -With Less Than. <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Issues: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> I. AESTH,ETICS. Would the'--.prcject:.-, <br /> a) Have..:.-substantial adverse X <br /> *effect on a scenic vista? <br /> b) Substantially damage scenic F1 X <br /> resources, including, but not <br /> ilimited1p,trees, rock. <br /> outcroppings, And historic <br /> buildirm_.s within.a.state st;enic <br /> highway? <br /> C) Subst6ntially degrade the F-1 X <br /> existiftrvisual•charocter or <br /> .quality of the site and its <br /> surroundings?,. <br /> d) Create a new source of El El X El <br /> substantial light or glare which <br /> would;adversely affect day or <br /> nightf-pe views in the area? <br />