Laserfiche WebLink
Soil Suitability / Nitrate Loading Study r ierracon <br /> FLAG CITY TRUCK AND EQUIPMENT PARKING FACILITY I Lodi, California <br /> October 6, 2023 1 Terracon Project No. NA237081 <br /> 1.6.7. Discussion of Percolation Test Results <br /> Based on the percolation tests results, the percolation test borings B1 at 9.8 feet, B2 at <br /> 6.80 feet and B3 at 3.0 feet bgs demonstrated satisfactory percolation rates. According <br /> to the OWTS Standards Table 1.10.2, for percolation rates between 5 minute per inch <br /> and less than or equal to 30 minutes per inch, a minimum 8-foot separation is required <br /> from the bottom of the dispersal system to groundwater. Groundwater was not <br /> encountered at 10.0 feet bgs at boring B1, B2 and B3 which does appear to meet the 8- <br /> foot separation requirement from the proposed bottom of the septic leach line. <br /> 1.6.8. Discussion of Septic System Sizing <br /> In general, septic system construction should follow the San Joaquin County On-Site <br /> Wastewater Disposal Standards (OWTS) where applicable. <br /> 2.NITRATE LOADING STUDY <br /> Because of concern regarding nitrate leaching into groundwater from septic systems, a <br /> nitrate loading analysis is required by the EHD for the proposed development to <br /> determine the potential concentration of percolating effluent and rain fall over the long <br /> term. Where percolating effluent leaches into the ground, groundwater quality may be <br /> impacted to some degree should the effluent reach groundwater. <br /> The method utilized for the nitrate loading analysis is based on a simple mass balance <br /> formula, discussed in a published article by Hantzsche and Finnemore (1992), which <br /> provides a convenient and simplified method to estimate long-term groundwater nitrate <br /> impacts on an area-wide basis. <br /> Hantzsche and Finnemore found that over a long period of time, water quality in the <br /> upper saturated groundwater zone closely approximates the quality of percolating <br /> recharge waters. They believe that their method is a good planning tool and provides <br /> useful information to planners and local officials but with some real limitations. In their <br /> article published in Ground Water, Hantzsche and Finnemore mention that "...the <br /> equation ignores dispersion, lateral flow, and mixing with groundwater flow from up- <br /> gradient areas. These processes would generally contribute to additional reduction of <br /> nitrate-nitrogen concentrations in groundwater to the extent that the nitrate-nitrogen <br /> concentration of groundwater flow from up-gradient areas is lower." <br /> The Hantzsche and Finnemore approach is "...a conservative (worst case) first <br /> approximation of groundwater nitrate-nitrogen concentration resulting from the <br /> combined effect of on-site sewage disposal systems and precipitation. This (the equation <br /> Facilities I Environmental I Geotechnical I Materials 13 <br />