Laserfiche WebLink
SAN�,J0A0UIN <br />COUNTY <br />Environmental Health Department <br />W.U1:onParcel A;only. This plan is not intended to address the wastes located in the southwest corner <br />of Parcel A at this time, but may be addressed at a later date under a separate plan. <br />As the intent of the work is to clean close the portion of WU1 on Parcel A to prepare the area for the <br />proposed stormwater detention basin, the documentation and activities need to be consistent with the <br />solid waste requirements for clean closure as provided in Title 27, Section 21810 and CalRecycle's LEA <br />Advisory #16 for Clean Closure. To that end, the following recommendations/revisions are being <br />requested at this time: <br />The EMMP Workplan Addendum title and content should be amended to reflect that the <br />document is proposing a plan for the clean closure of WU1, in addition to the plan for the <br />excavation and materials management activities. Alternatively, a stand-alone Clean Closure <br />Plan may be submitted to supplement the EMMP Workplan Addendum. <br />An amended Clean Closure PlanlEMMP Workplan Addendum should include the applicable <br />minimum components for clean closure pursuant to the two references noted above, including: <br />o Clean Closure Plan Purpose — the current EMMP. Workplan Addendum addresses the <br />method for closure activities (excavation and materials management) but does not provide <br />a discussion that the activities are intended for the clean closure of WU1. A discussion <br />should be provided to document that the removal of wastes and associated contaminated <br />soils will be conducted for a clean closure of the unit to protect public health and safety, to <br />eliminate the need for postclosure maintenance, and to prepare the site for the proposed <br />postclosure land use (stormwater detention basin). The revised Clean Closure PlanlEMMP <br />Workplan Addendum should clarify that the scope of work is limited to the disposal area of <br />WU1 on Parcel A only and is not intended to address the waste located in the southwest <br />corner of Parcel A. <br />o Postclosure Land Use — a description of the postclosure land use for the area of WU1 <br />should be included in the Clean Closure PlanlEMMP Workplan Addendum. <br />o Certification — each submittal shall be certified by a registered civil engineer or.a certified <br />engineering geologist. Page 3 of the current EMMP Workplan Addendum already contains <br />the signature of a certified engineering geologist. Any amended or subsequent submittal <br />should also include this certification. <br />o Site Characterization — the characterization of WU1 is already addressed on page 2 of the <br />current EMMP Workplan Addendum, including a statement that the extent is estimated at <br />this time and the full extent will be determined at the time of removal. Please be advised <br />there is some risk associated with removal activities conducted prior to full characterization <br />that may result in unplanned or unanticipated outcomes. The characterization of the wastes <br />located in the southwestern corner of Parcel A do not have to be addressed here if the scope <br />of the activities was adequately discussed in the purpose section of the revised Clean <br />Closure Plan/EMMP Workplan Addendum document. <br />o Excavation and Materials Management — the current EMMP Workplan Addendum <br />addresses the excavation and materials management activities for WU1 and proposes to <br />remove waste materials and associated contaminated soils to target industrial screening <br />levels. However, depending on the full depth of the proposed stormwater detention basin, <br />additional soil beyond that required to meet industrial screening levels may need to be <br />removed from the WU1 area to construct the stormwater detention basin. Depending on the <br />s:,�l rl...,,+., of +hie nrirlifinnall" excavated soil the use of industrial screening <br />III al disposition/location v� uuv u�wu y vi � <br />levels may not be appropriate. Please provide additional discussion to address the use of <br />industrial screening levels and the potential further removal of impacted soil during the <br />2of3 <br />