Laserfiche WebLink
EDT Checked (Date/initials) <br /> EDT Flagged <br /> Data Evaluation Checklist—GC/MS Analyses <br /> Project 1D: <br /> ti( —iA rmts-65 <br /> Method: l~)24ti <br /> Reviewer's Initials and Date Reviewed: o-, bb <br /> SDG: D hr 27,l <br /> Review QuQ,,stions Yes No NA Sam le (Anal tes) AffectedJComments Fla <br /> 1. Were holding times met? l 23 d2 <br /> Were sample preservation requirements met? f <br /> 3. Was cooler receipt form completed? <br /> 4. Was method blank analyzed with each batch?Did the blank <br /> meet QC criteria? <br /> 5. Were target analytes reported in field blank or rinsate <br /> samples above the MDL? L/ <br /> 6. Was a field duplicate analyzed?Were R.PDs within project <br /> specifications? <br /> 7. Was an LCS analyzed with each batch?Did recoveries meet <br /> QC criteria? <br /> 8. Was an MS/MSD pair analyzed with each batch?Were <br /> recoveries and RPDs within project specifications? ` V <br /> 9. If an MS/MSD was not analyzed, was an CS/LCS <br /> analyzed? Were recoveries and RPDs within project limits'? ✓ <br /> ft <br /> . Were surrogate recoveries within project specifications? ✓ <br /> Initial Calibration: <br /> a. Were tune criteria met? <br /> b. Were SPCC and,CCC criteria met? <br /> I lc. Did all calibration analytcs meet criteria? <br /> 1 id. Did the second source initial calibration verification meet <br /> project criteria? <br /> Continuine Calibratjgn: <br /> 12a. Were tune criteria met? <br /> 12b. Were SPCC and CCC criteria met? <br /> 12c, Did all calibration analytes meet criteria? <br /> 13, Did internal standards meet criteria? <br /> 14. Was the case narrative complete? <br /> h1t �G '�Vtcr <br />