Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> 1 • <br /> URS Corporation <br /> February 10, 2005 <br /> ' Page 2 <br /> ' values can be affected by both metallic and nonmetallic debris. IPC values are also affected by the <br /> electrical conductivity of the subsurface. However,they are particularly sensitive to the presence of <br /> both ferrous and non-ferrous metal objects to depths of approximately 7 to 10 feet. The effect that <br /> ' ferrous or nonferrous metal will have on the respective TC or IPC readings is dependent upon the depth <br /> and size of the metal object. We performed the EM survey using a Geonics EM31-DL ground <br /> ' conductivity meter connected to an Omnidata data recorder. <br /> VMG surveys are used to define localized magnetic variations that are caused by ferrous sources. For <br /> ' this survey, we used the VMG method to determine the locations of buried metallic (ferrous)debris <br /> within the suspected landfill. We used a Geometrics G-858 cesium vapor magnetometer to obtain the <br /> vertical magnetic gradient data, since it provides high sensitivity and rapid data acquisition. <br /> ' ER surveys are used to measure the electrical resistivity of the subsurface. Variations in the electrical <br /> properties may be caused by changes in subsurface materials due to landfill debris. For this survey,we <br /> ' used the dipole-dipole electrode configuration.The dipole-dipole array was chosen because it provides <br /> information on both the depth and lateral extent of subsurface electrical properties. We acquired the <br /> ER data using a Sting RI Resistivity meter with the Swift automatic multi-electrode system. Both <br /> ' systems are manufactured by Advanced Geosciences Incorporated. Descriptions of the EM,VMG,and <br /> ER methods are provided in Appendix A. <br /> ' Horizontal Control <br /> Prior to proceeding with the geophysical work, we established a survey grid to provide horizontal <br /> ' control. The survey grid was based on a rectangular coordinate system with the origin(OE,ON)located <br /> on the fence line to the southwest.We established the grid in the field using a fiberglass measuring tape <br /> and marking paint. The marking paint was used to mark the grid nodes every 20 by 100 feet on the <br /> ground. Wooden lath were used to mark the grid nodes every 100 by 100 feet. This grid was then used <br /> to guide the EM, VMG, and ER surveys. <br /> ' Following the geophysical investigations,we used a Trimble Pro XRS global positioning system(GPS) <br /> to survey the corners of the horizontal control grid. These coordinates were then used to convert the <br /> ' horizontal control grid to a California State Plane coordinate system, as shown on Plates 1 through 4. <br /> The GPS was also used to survey the perimeter fence, and the vapor monitoring wells along the <br /> perimeter. <br /> ' VMG/EM Surveys <br /> ' VMG data were obtained every 2 to 4 feet along southeast-northwest trending traverses spaced 10 feet <br /> apart,resulting in a total of 13,470 VMG measurement points. EM data were obtained every 10 feet <br />