Laserfiche WebLink
CIWMB April 14, 2003 <br />Santa Fe Road Disposal Sites Project No. 104690003 <br /> <br />ness of refuse and/or debris. Figure 2 indicates the estimated aerial extent and thickness of <br />burned refuse with and/or without refuse and/or debris. <br />The following assumptions and limitations were used to estimate the rough order-of-magnitude <br />volumes of buried wastes: <br />• Except where actual trenches were excavated, all areas of buried wastes (Figures 1 and 2) <br />are estimates only and are based on limited field investigation data. The lines indicating the <br />aerial extent and thickness of buried wastes were arrived at based on the widely spaced <br />trenches and are assumed estimates only. <br />• Only observations made at trench locations were used to estimate the waste volume quanti- <br />ties. There are areas where there are no trenches and at these locations the closest available <br />data was used and assumptions were made based on the field investigation. <br />• Rough subjective interpolation was used to estimate the types, thickness, and extent of bur- <br />ied wastes between trenches. <br />• Only the northwest portion of the Waller Property was evaluated which only consisted of <br />excavating seven trenches. <br />• There is only limited data for the westerly property boundary of the Lynch IDS in the area to <br />the adjacent east of the railroad tracks. It was assumed that wastes, when encountered in <br />trench excavations near the central and eastern portion of the site, extended to the westerly <br />property boundary with the railroad tracks. <br />• At each location, for purposes of estimating a volume of buried wastes, within each thick- <br />ness range, the buried wastes were assumed to be a continuous layer. Although field <br />observations from this assessment indicated discrete trenches containing buried wastes, con- <br />tinuous layers were assumed for conservative estimates. Trenches containing up to 5 feet <br />thickness of buried wastes were assumed to have an average waste thickness of 2.5 feet. Ar- <br />eas estimated as having 5 to 10 feet of wastes were assumed to have an average waste <br />thickness ranging from 5 to 7.5 feet, depending on the actual thickness of wastes as recorded <br />on the individual trench logs. Areas having wastes of 10 to 15 feet and 15 to 20 feet were as- <br />sumed to have a waste thickness of 11 to 12.5 feet (depending on actual waste thicknesses as <br />recorded on individual trench logs), and 18 feet respectfully (Figures 1 and 2). <br />• The soil mixed in with the buried wastes was considered as part of the wastes for the volume <br />estimates. <br />• If more than one type of buried waste (e.g. burned refuse and construction and refuse) was <br />observed in the same trench, the materials were separated to differentiate the burned materi- <br />104690003 SFRDS Waste Volume Estimate PDF.doc <br />2