Laserfiche WebLink
Page 9 <br /> September 11,2023 <br /> Brusca File No. 260-004 Anderson Barngrover Ranch <br /> lateral extent of fuel-related VOCs in groundwater are defined by non-detect results to the <br /> north, east, and south, and by extrapolation of concentrations to the west. As shown on <br /> Plate 7, the extent of the diesel groundwater plume is generally defined to the north, west, <br /> and east(by non-detect results and extrapolation). However,the southerly extent of diesel <br /> groundwater plume is yet defined. <br /> f. Secondary source has been removed to the extent practicable: It has not yet been <br /> determined that secondary source removal at the subject property is necessary, and no such <br /> work has been completed. Given the proximity of buildings to the area of the former UST, <br /> removal/excavation of a substantial amount of secondary source materials (i.e., impacted <br /> soils) could be difficult and somewhat impractical. <br /> g. Soil or groundwater has been tested for methyl tent-butyl ether (MTBE) and results <br /> reported in accordance with Health and Safety Code section 25296.1 S: Soil and <br /> groundwater samples from the area of the former diesel UST have been tested for MTBE. <br /> None of the tested soil or groundwater samples contained MTBE at concentrations above <br /> the laboratory reporting limits, except that the groundwater samples from Borings TH5 and <br /> TH 10 contained very low MTBE concentrations(1.2 ug/L and 1.7 ug/L, respectively) that <br /> are below the drinking water standard of 5.0 ug/L. <br /> h. Nuisance as defined by Water Code section 13050 does not exist at the site: The cited <br /> Water Code defines "nuisance" as conditions that are injurious to health, are offensive to <br /> the senses, affects the community, or occurs as a result of waste disposal. The subsurface <br /> diesel impacts are not considered a"nuisance"per the cited code definition. <br /> Media-Specific Criteria <br /> 1. Groundwater <br /> The referenced State Water Resources Control Board's LTCP presents characteristics for <br /> five different groundwater site classes; the characteristics of at least one site class must be <br /> met for site closure. Classes 1 through 4 of the LTCP guidelines are based in part on the <br /> length of the groundwater plume, which is yet undefined to the south. Additionally, the <br /> proximity of the onsite water wells precludes conformance to the criteria of groundwater <br /> Classes 1 through 4 of the LTCP. However, it is possible that the site could meet the <br /> criteria for Class 5; Class 5 of the groundwater-specific criteria applies to cases where the <br /> regulatory agency determines that, based on an analysis of site-specific conditions, the <br /> contaminant plume poses a low threat to human health and safety and to the environment. <br /> Testing of the main water supply well in March 2023 did not identify contaminants at <br /> concentrations above the laboratory reporting limits, and the very low concentration of <br /> TPH as diesel detected in the northerly irrigation well in May 2023 is below the referenced <br /> ESL value(MCL Priority). As indicated earlier in this report,as a part of UST case closure <br /> it would be prudent to resample the main water supply well at the site to confirm that the <br /> water supplied by this deep well is unaffected by the shallow diesel release. <br />