Laserfiche WebLink
Outlook <br />Re: PR0516151 - 10500 S Harlan Rd - APSA Inspection Report <br />From Saetern, Kristina Gaen [EHD] <ksaetern@sjgov.org> <br />Date Tue 9/2/2025 2:30 PM <br />To Ferreira, Jordan <Jordan.Ferreira@gcinc.com> <br />Cc Bartron, Kelly <Kelly.Bartron@gcinc.com> <br />B 2 attachments (174 KB) <br />PR0516151 - 10500 S Harlan Rd - AMENDED APSA Report.pdf, PR0516151 - 10500 S Harlan Rd - AMENDED APSA RTC.pdf; <br />Hi Jordan, <br />After reviewing your comments, our response addressing your concerns are provided below in blue. Attached are <br />the amended inspection report and return to compliance (RTC). Please ensure you are using this amended RTC <br />when making the corrections. <br />9. The Tanks were never formally removed or closed out from the plan, they were just not in use. They were still <br />part of secondary containment calculations and spill response evaluations. At the time that they were brought <br />back online we decided based on this that it was not a change to our potential discharge. We believe this to not <br />be a violation and that it was not a technical amendment. <br />After review, and based on your statement that the two 20,000 -gallon diesel tanks did not alter the facility's <br />potential for discharge, the violation will be rescinded. <br />14. These 3 tanks are not APSA regulated as mentioned at the bottom of the table in appendix D of the SPCC plan. <br />These tanks held Magnaplex products which is a grease and is not liquid at 60 degrees F. We will plan to add them <br />to the "Area C" map but argue that since they are not APSA regulated materials and tanks that this should not be <br />a violation. <br />Based on your statement the violation regarding the Magnaplex products, which were listed on the map but <br />not observed on site, will be rescinded. <br />56. AST -1, AST -2, and AST -14 have been regularly inspected annually as well as weekly. Annual STI tank inspections <br />have included AST -1,-2, and -14 going back a number of years. Unsure what constituted an issue to include this as <br />a repeat violation and would argue that the tanks have been regularly inspected. <br />This violation has been removed and incorporated into the comment for Violation #57 under 'Observation <br />#2,' based on §112.7(e) <br />Best, <br />Kristina Saetern <br />Environmental Health Specialist <br />San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br />1868 E. Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 <br />P: (209) 616 — 3045 1 E: ksaetern@sjgov.org <br />www.sjgov.org EHD <br />