My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_JTD 9/3/2025
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_JTD 9/3/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 11:06:20 AM
Creation date
10/6/2025 9:32:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
JTD 9/3/2025
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433 - LANDFILL DISPOSAL SITE
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
Site Address
6484 N WAVERLY RD LINDEN 95236
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1437
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Foothill Sanitary Landfill 3 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br />First Semiannual 2025 Groundwater Monitoring ©2025 County of San Joaquin. All rights reserved. <br /> <br />2.0 COMPLIANCE HISTORY SUMMARY <br />2.1 History <br />Prior to March 2000, no groundwater impacts had been determined due to landfill activities. From <br />March 2000 to October 2001, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected at a single <br />groundwater monitoring well, MW-3, adjacent to unlined LF-1. These detections have been <br />ascribed to ponding on refuse along a road immediately adjacent to that monitoring well during <br />the previous five years. Impact to groundwater at other wells was not detected. <br />In the spring of 1998, ponding in this area had been corrected by covering the refuse and grading <br />the area to drain. However, penetration of water into the refuse below the ponding area <br />apparently caused an increase in landfill gas (LFG) production in the years after ponding was <br />corrected, sufficient to cause VOC impact to groundwater. Correction of the ponding allowed the <br />LFG production to dissipate. <br />In February 2002, approximately four years after correcting the surface ponding, water samples <br />from MW-3 indicated that the VOC impact to groundwater had ceased. <br />On November 6, 2002, nine months after the last detection of VOCs at MW-3, the County <br />submitted an Evaluation Monitoring Plan at the request of CVRWQCB staff. This Plan proposed <br />methods to delineate the nature and extent of groundwater impact previously seen at MW-3. <br />The Plan included drilling and sampling from temporary borings, and a “step-out step-down” <br />approach if groundwater contamination was detected at those borings. <br />On January 30, 2003, eleven months after the last detection of VOCs at MW-3, the CVRWQCB <br />issued new WDRs R5-2003-0020. These WDRs required the closure of unlined Module “I” (LF-1) <br />and the monitoring of soil gas for VOCs as corrective actions. Groundwater contamination was <br />not indicated at that time. <br />In June 2003, one and one-half years after the last detection of VOCs at MW-3, the Evaluation <br />Monitoring Program was completed. Groundwater samples from temporary borings were found <br />free of contaminants, consistent with data from the permanent monitoring wells since February <br />2002. A deep soil gas probe, SG-1, was bored to sample soil gas above the water table near <br />groundwater monitoring well MW-3. Four VOCs were detected at SG-1; however, these <br />compounds were not detected in the water samples taken at MW-3 at that time. The County <br />concluded that the corrective action of removing the ponding had prevented further groundwater <br />impact at that time. <br />On September 16, 2003, due to a delay in submitting the results of the Evaluation Monitoring <br />Plan, the CVRWQCB issued a Water Code Section 13267 Order. This Order required that the <br />County submit the results of the Evaluation Monitoring Program and an Engineering Feasibility <br />Report (EFS) that includes closure of Module ‘I’. That Order did not require the submittal of a <br />Closure Plan (the Preliminary Closure Plan was on file with CVRWQCB at that time).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.