Laserfiche WebLink
Foothill Sanitary Landfill 5 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br />First Semiannual 2025 Groundwater Monitoring ©2025 County of San Joaquin. All rights reserved. <br /> <br />In the spring of 2009, healthy vegetation was observed on the ET cap area. <br />On June 10, 2009, CVRWQCB staff issued a notice of violation for discharge of wastes outside <br />of containment due to the presence of VOCs in the soil within County property. Refuse was not <br />discharged at those locations. <br />On March 4, 2009, San Joaquin County staff noticed that the LFG condensate pump discharge <br />was connected to the secondary leachate sump of Module 1 rather than to the leachate collection <br />and removal system (LCRS). <br />In April 2009, the LFG condensate was removed from the secondary sump, and the soil gas <br />trench (installed beneath the liner of Module 1) was activated to enhance the protection of <br />groundwater. <br />An investigation in October 2009 indicated that the condensate had been forced between the <br />primary and secondary liner up the side of the landfill, and had been discharged a few feet below <br />ground surface into the anchor trench along the side of the landfill where the primary and <br />secondary liners terminate. <br />In March 2011, the continuing removal of liquid from the secondary sump, including increased <br />removal during a high-water level event in the primary sump, indicated hydraulic communication <br />between the primary and secondary sump. <br />In October 2011, as agreed by District staff, the County installed an automatic pump in the <br />secondary sump to maintain the liquid head above the liner below 12ā€, in accordance with CCR <br />Title 27. This pump continues to operate. <br />In December 2011, the County replaced LFG extraction well GX-2 with well GX-2A, and <br />upgraded the LFG collection piping, which included an increase in the LFG pipe size, to increase <br />the collection rate from wells GX-7 and GX-9. <br />VOCs were again detected in MW-3 in the first quarter 2011, approximately five years after <br />placing the impermeable barrier. This was the first VOC detection in MW-3 since the fourth <br />quarter of 2001. No other wells were impacted. <br />The County submitted an EFS on August 25, 2014, followed by a Revised EFS on December <br />19, 2014. An Addendum to the Revised EFS was submitted on July 17, 2015 proposing the <br />installation of five tri-level soil gas probes and eight LFG extraction wells. The CVRWQCB <br />approved the Addendum entailing that scope of work in a letter dated July 27, 2015. <br />In November 2016, a Well Installation Report was submitted to the CVRWQCB that described <br />the installation of five (5) tri-level soil gas probes (SG-2A, SG-3A, SG-6A, SG-10A, and SG-11A) <br />and eight LFG extraction wells in the summer of 2016. The tri-level soil gas monitoring probes <br />were installed to determine the extent of LFG migration from the base of unlined LF-1. Four (4) <br />LFG extraction wells (GX-10, GX-11, GX-12, and GX-13) were installed in Module ā€œIā€ to control <br />groundwater impacts caused by LFG migration from LF-1. Wells GX-10 and GX-11 were <br />installed near well MW-3 to provide enhanced vacuum within the refuse mass in close proximity <br />to MW-3 where VOCs had previously been detected. Four (4) additional LFG extraction wells