My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU-2500946_SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PRIEST
>
9128
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-2500946_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2025 9:11:04 AM
Creation date
12/16/2025 8:55:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU-2500946
PE
2602 - SOIL SUITABILITY AND NITRATE LOADING STUDY REVIEW
STREET_NUMBER
9128
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
PRIEST
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
FRENCH CAMP
Zip
95231
APN
19322078
CURRENT_STATUS
In Review
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
9128 S PRIEST RD FRENCH CAMP 95231
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0-°iQU SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> -j- 2 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> �.ki Atlij 1868 East Hazelton Avenue, Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> • cv • Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fax:(209)468-3877 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> 60 <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION:9128 S. PRIEST ROAD, FRENCH CAMP CA 95231,SU-2500946 PA#: <br /> APN: 193-220-78 REPORT DATE: ,,�/A <br /> S = Sufficient VZOW <br /> 1 �dU�YYI t� <br /> I = Insufficient S ��p <br /> an Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> [ ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> YO tblh W <br /> 14 ❑ 2.1 Description of: depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth, directional flow and gradient. <br /> ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. <br /> ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of '?.❑VISI - <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. Y,(C t�6(hon <br /> ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers, lakes etc. <br /> 4�COYre4e�rl <br /> TTT - <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ❑ ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. '� <br /> ❑ ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or anv other constituent of concern, at and/or around the proiect site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ❑ ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. �p�C a• �� 1�1 <br /> x.10.10�Q1� <br /> ❑ ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: Safi ki '�t 7�q r l M G U M iA Reviewed Date: <br /> -Ist Z5 <br /> EHD 26-02 Page 1 of 2 Nitrate Loading Study Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.