My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2026
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CENTER
>
430
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231425
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2026 4:50:15 PM
Creation date
2/9/2026 9:43:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2026
RECORD_ID
PR0231425
PE
2361 - UST FACILITY
FACILITY_ID
FA0003838
FACILITY_NAME
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC. MANTECA CO
STREET_NUMBER
430
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CENTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
21721070
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\bmascaro
Supplemental fields
Site Address
430 W CENTER ST MANTECA 95336
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t' <br /> Underground Storage Tank <br /> Release Detection Equipment Testing Report Form : <br /> 5. MONITORING SYSTEM AND PROGRAMMING <br /> A separate Release Detection Equipment Testing Report Form must be prepared for each <br /> monitoring system. <br /> Manufacturer of Monitoring Model of Monitoring System Software Version Installed <br /> System Control Panel Control Panel <br /> �trlPU►�tCf��a r TMS,1iwu � <br /> Attach the post-testing reports if the monitoring system is capable of generating Yes No NA i <br /> either: ❑ Monitoring System Set-up Report ❑ Alarm History Report <br /> Is all release detection equipment that was tested operational per manufacturer's ❑ <br /> specifications? <br /> Is the secondary containment free of damage, debris, or liquid? ❑ <br /> Are the release detection audible and visual alarms operational? �$`1' ❑ <br /> Have all sensors been: 1) visually inspected for wiring kinks, breaks and residual )ff ❑ ❑ <br /> buildup on floats,- and 2) tested for functionality and confirmed operational? <br /> Are all sensors installed to detect a release at the earliest opportunity? ❑ ❑ <br /> Was the monitoring system set-up reviewed, and proper settings confirmed? ❑ ❑ <br /> Was the monitoring system's backup battery visually inspected, functionally tested, ❑ ❑ A <br /> and confirmed operational? <br /> Was it confirmed that the flow of hazardous substance stops at the dispenser if a ❑ ❑ <br /> release is detected in the under-dispenser containment? <br /> Does the pressure supply pump automatically shut down if the piping secondary ❑ ❑ Pr <br /> containment monitoring system fails to operate or is disconnected? <br /> Does the pressure supply pump automatically shut down if the piping secondary <br /> containment monitoring system detects a release? Which sensors initiate positive ❑ ❑ <br /> shut down? (Check all that apply) ❑ Containment Sump ❑ UDC <br /> If release detection alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring center, is all © ❑ <br /> communication equipment operational? <br /> If there is any buried single-wall suction hazardous substance piping, was it <br /> confirmed using the inspection method approved by the Unified Program Agency, ❑ ❑ <br /> that the pipe contents drain back into the UST if the suction is released? <br /> Describe all answers marked "No"or"Fail"and the proposed remedy in Section 8. <br /> List all equipment either replaced or repaired (including cleaning or adjustment) in Section 8. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.