CORRESPONDENCE - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Martinez, Genesis [EHD] From: Tylor McMillan <tylor@wellblaster.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 8:26 AM To: Wong,Jeff [EHD] Subject: Re: REDM Env.- 3138 E Main Stockton - nested SVE wells destruction work plan clarification Jeff, I will be bumping the charge strength in the shallow nest setting to destroy all casings not contacting cemented areas of the boring. We will be maintaining the standard 25 grain for the deep setting and 100 grain for the shallow setting on each nested well. This method has cost savings for the client and does not impact the existing barrier seal between the shallow and deep set nests. Thank you, Tylor McMillan Tylor McMillan's Well Service, LLC Owner/Blaster www.wellblaster.com California Groundwater Association Vice President www.groundh2o.org 916-761-5224 This e-mail message and any attached electronic files are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s)named above, are confidential, and may be legally privileged. Unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying if this e-mail message or any part thereof is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail and/or by phone and delete all copies of this e-mail message including attachments from your computer system. On May 16, 2023, at 8:21 AM, Wong,Jeff[EHD] <Jwong@sjgov.org>wrote: Tylor: Is Mike's description below what you have in mind? I have attached one of your proposals from a previous project where you gave two options. Can you help me clarify? Are you going to be using 25 grain cord, or 100 grain cord for the deeper one? Mike referenced placing extra charge in the shallow well,which is a little different than how we had done therefore. I'm probably fine either way as I rely on the expertise and experience of your company. Best Regards,