Laserfiche WebLink
LtNU.mdp,p„ Close out parr„dre Evans GMsubarvan, Aho,2017 <br /> Lisslikepill <br /> The fact that Mere was no rebound of Vt%s in ground water above the MCL cleanup standards <br /> in ever five yeah of monitoring fallowing treatment system shutdown, and Mat VOC <br /> concentrations nued to decrease towards reporting limitsduring this time, provides rurther <br /> evidence Mat the debris burial trenches are not a signifcant continuing source of VOCs to Eastern <br /> GSA ground water. <br /> No unacceptable risk or named was identified far ecological receptors in Me baseline risk <br /> ant for Me Eastern USA Suarea.b <br /> assessment 1995, a Feasibility Study Mr the GSA OU that evaluated remedial alternatives for cleanup <br /> s sued. A Proposed Plan for Envirvmncntal Cleanup of the USA OU was issued in 1996 for <br /> the public to review and comment on the remedial alternatives and proposed cleanup remedy and <br /> standards. <br /> As discussed in Seution 2.1 above and presented in Appendix A, DOEII.LNL conducted <br /> additional characterization a SVOCSIPAHs and PCBs in subsurface soil and SVOCs in ground <br /> water in MCI stern GSA debris burial trenches area in Ml 4. <br /> Because SVOCs or PAHs were not deteckd in any of the soil or ground water samples <br /> tattersall in the Pamem GSA debris burial trench area above the reporting bonus, DOE and the <br /> regulatory agencies agreed that the re cstimsion of SVOCs and PAI Is in Me Memo GSA debris <br /> burial =rich area was complete, and no further action for these anstionams was needed. <br /> 'rho PCB analytical data for samples collected in the Eastern USA debris burial trench area <br /> indicate Mat: <br /> While PCPs were detected above Me analytical repented limit in some mil samples, <br /> were below CPA's residential and industrial mil Regional Screening Levels <br /> and the MCL-bead Protection of Ground Water Soil Screening Levels. Therefore, these <br /> a t rnts do not pose an unacceptable risk or impact to ground water above MCLs. <br /> The lateral and vertical extent of PCBs in subsurface suit is bounded by non-detections, or <br /> evidence of native material. <br /> PCBs were not detected above the reporting limits in any ground water samples collected <br /> Real wells located near and/or do negmdit nt from the boreholes in which Me PCBs were <br /> detected. <br /> Therefore, DOE and the riegulakry agencies agreed that the investigation of PCHs in the <br /> Eastern USA debris burial trench area was complete, and no further action for these constituents <br /> was needed. <br /> 2.4. Record of Decision <br /> In January 19972 the U.S. DOE, EPA, DISC, and the RWQCB signed a ROD in which the <br /> final remedial action and cleanup standards were saleckd Mr the GSA OU (U.S. DOE, 1997). <br /> The selected remedy fiu the Eastem GSA consisted of: <br /> I) Monituring ground water to evaluate the elTectivemss ofthe remedy in achieving cleanup <br /> standards, and to ensure Men: is no impact to downgns lent water-supply wells. <br /> 2) Institutionabland use amends to prevent human exposure to communication and to market <br /> Me integrity ofthe remedy. <br />